Kannada language excluded from railway exam in B’luru, sparks row
The recent decision by the South Western Railway to exclude Kannada as a medium for an exam conducted in Bengaluru has sparked a major controversy, with pro-Kannada groups and politicians expressing outrage over the move. The exam, which was conducted in the city, only allowed candidates to take the test in Hindi and English, leaving out the local language of Kannada. This decision has been widely criticized, with many arguing that it reflects a systemic bias designed to favor Hindi-speaking candidates over local ones.
The issue has taken a political turn, with BJP leader CT Ravi weighing in on the matter. Ravi called the exclusion of Kannada a “technical injustice” and demanded that the railway authorities take immediate action to rectify the situation. The leader’s comments have added fuel to the fire, with many Kannada activists and supporters taking to the streets to protest against the decision.
The controversy has also raised questions about the status of Kannada in the state of Karnataka, where Bengaluru is located. Despite being the official language of the state, Kannada is often overlooked in favor of Hindi and English, particularly in official contexts. This has led to a sense of resentment among Kannada speakers, who feel that their language is being marginalized and ignored.
The exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam is not an isolated incident. In recent years, there have been several instances where the language has been overlooked or marginalized in official contexts. For example, many government forms and documents are only available in Hindi and English, leaving out Kannada speakers who may not be proficient in these languages. This has created a sense of alienation among Kannada speakers, who feel that their language is not being given the respect and recognition it deserves.
The controversy has also sparked a wider debate about the role of language in Indian society. With India being a multilingual country, the question of which language should be given priority is a complex and contentious one. While Hindi is the official language of the country, many states have their own official languages, which are often overlooked in favor of Hindi and English.
In the case of Karnataka, the exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam has been seen as a threat to the language and culture of the state. Many Kannada activists and supporters have argued that the decision reflects a broader attempt to impose Hindi on non-Hindi speaking states, and to suppress the local languages and cultures of these regions.
The issue has also been taken up by the Karnataka government, which has expressed its opposition to the decision. The state government has argued that the exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam is a violation of the language’s rights and privileges, and has demanded that the railway authorities take immediate action to rectify the situation.
In response to the controversy, the South Western Railway has issued a statement saying that the decision to exclude Kannada was taken due to “technical reasons”. However, this explanation has been rejected by Kannada activists and supporters, who argue that the decision reflects a deeper bias against the language.
The controversy has also sparked a wider discussion about the importance of language in Indian society. With many languages facing the threat of extinction, the issue of language preservation and promotion has become a pressing concern. In the case of Kannada, the exclusion from the railway exam has highlighted the need for greater recognition and respect for the language, particularly in official contexts.
In conclusion, the exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam in Bengaluru has sparked a major controversy, with many arguing that it reflects a systemic bias designed to favor Hindi-speaking candidates over local ones. The issue has taken a political turn, with BJP leader CT Ravi calling the decision a “technical injustice” and demanding that the railway authorities take immediate action to rectify the situation. The controversy has also raised questions about the status of Kannada in the state of Karnataka, and has sparked a wider debate about the role of language in Indian society.
As the controversy continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how the railway authorities will respond to the criticism and outrage. However, one thing is clear: the exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam has highlighted the need for greater recognition and respect for the language, particularly in official contexts. It is hoped that the controversy will lead to a greater awareness and appreciation of the importance of language in Indian society, and will prompt efforts to promote and preserve the country’s rich linguistic diversity.
About the Author
