Kannada language excluded from railway exam in B’luru, sparks row
The recent decision by the South Western Railway to exclude Kannada as a medium from an exam conducted in Bengaluru has sparked a major row, with pro-Kannada groups and politicians protesting against the move. The exam, which was conducted in Hindi and English only, has been criticized for reflecting a systemic bias designed to favor Hindi-speaking candidates over local ones. The issue has triggered sharp protests and debates, with many questioning the rationale behind excluding the local language from the exam.
The exam in question was conducted by the South Western Railway in Bengaluru, the capital city of Karnataka, where Kannada is the official language. However, to the surprise and dismay of many, Kannada was not included as a medium for the exam, with only Hindi and English being allowed. This move has been widely criticized, with many arguing that it is a deliberate attempt to marginalize the local language and favor Hindi-speaking candidates.
Pro-Kannada groups have been at the forefront of the protests, arguing that the decision is a blatant disregard for the rights of Kannada-speaking people. They have pointed out that Bengaluru is the capital city of Karnataka, and it is only logical that the local language should be included as a medium for any exam conducted in the city. The exclusion of Kannada, they argue, is a systemic bias designed to favor Hindi-speaking candidates over local ones.
BJP leader CT Ravi has also weighed in on the issue, calling it a “technical injustice”. He has argued that the decision to exclude Kannada from the exam is a clear case of discrimination against the local language and its speakers. Ravi has demanded that the railway authorities take immediate action to rectify the situation and include Kannada as a medium for the exam.
The issue has also sparked a wider debate about the importance of promoting and preserving local languages. Many have argued that the exclusion of Kannada from the exam is a symptom of a larger problem, where local languages are being marginalized and ignored in favor of Hindi and English. This, they argue, is a threat to the cultural and linguistic diversity of the country, and needs to be addressed urgently.
The protests and debates surrounding the issue have also highlighted the need for greater sensitivity and awareness about the importance of local languages. Many have pointed out that language is an integral part of a person’s identity and culture, and that excluding a local language from an exam is a disregard for the rights and dignity of the people who speak it.
In response to the protests and criticism, the railway authorities have argued that the decision to exclude Kannada from the exam was taken due to “technical reasons”. However, this explanation has been rejected by pro-Kannada groups and politicians, who argue that it is a flimsy excuse for a deliberate attempt to marginalize the local language.
The issue has also sparked a wider discussion about the role of language in education and employment. Many have argued that language should not be a barrier to education or employment, and that people should be able to access opportunities in their local language. This, they argue, is particularly important in a country like India, where linguistic and cultural diversity is a major strength.
In conclusion, the exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam in Bengaluru has sparked a major row, with pro-Kannada groups and politicians protesting against the move. The issue has highlighted the need for greater sensitivity and awareness about the importance of local languages, and the need to promote and preserve linguistic and cultural diversity. It has also sparked a wider debate about the role of language in education and employment, and the need to ensure that people are able to access opportunities in their local language.
As the debate and protests continue, it remains to be seen how the railway authorities will respond to the criticism and demands for inclusion of Kannada as a medium for the exam. One thing is clear, however: the issue has sparked a major conversation about the importance of language and culture, and the need to promote and preserve local languages.
About the Author
