Kannada language excluded from railway exam in B’luru, sparks row
The recent decision by the South Western Railway to exclude Kannada as a medium from an exam conducted in Bengaluru has sparked a major row, with pro-Kannada groups and leaders condemning the move as a “technical injustice” designed to favour Hindi-speaking candidates over local ones. The exam, which was held in Bengaluru, allowed only Hindi and English as the medium of instruction, leaving out the local language of Kannada.
This move has triggered sharp protests from pro-Kannada groups, who argue that the decision reflects a systemic bias against the local language and people. The exclusion of Kannada as a medium from the exam has been seen as a deliberate attempt to undermine the importance of the local language and to favour candidates from outside the state who are more proficient in Hindi.
The issue has also been taken up by BJP leader CT Ravi, who has termed the exclusion of Kannada as a “technical injustice”. Ravi has argued that the decision is unacceptable and that the railway authorities should have included Kannada as a medium of instruction in the exam. He has also pointed out that Bengaluru is the capital of Karnataka, and it is only logical that the local language should be given prominence in any exam conducted in the city.
The controversy has also raised questions about the commitment of the central government to promoting the use of local languages in official transactions. The central government has often spoken about the importance of promoting the use of local languages, but the exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam suggests that this commitment is not being taken seriously.
The use of local languages in official transactions is an important issue, as it affects the ability of local people to access government services and to participate in the democratic process. The exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam is a clear example of how the lack of commitment to promoting local languages can have serious consequences for the people of Karnataka.
Pro-Kannada groups have also argued that the exclusion of Kannada from the exam is a violation of the linguistic rights of the people of Karnataka. The groups have pointed out that the central government has a constitutional obligation to promote the use of local languages, and that the exclusion of Kannada from the exam is a clear breach of this obligation.
The controversy has also sparked a wider debate about the role of language in Indian society. The use of language is an important aspect of Indian culture and identity, and the exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam has been seen as an attack on the cultural and linguistic heritage of the people of Karnataka.
In recent years, there have been several instances of language controversies in India, with different groups and communities demanding greater recognition and promotion of their languages. The controversy over the exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam is just the latest example of this trend, and it highlights the need for a more nuanced and inclusive approach to language policy in India.
The central government has often been accused of promoting the use of Hindi at the expense of other languages, and the exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam has been seen as a clear example of this bias. The government has argued that Hindi is the national language of India, and that it should be promoted as such. However, this argument has been rejected by many linguistic and cultural groups, who argue that the promotion of Hindi should not come at the expense of other languages.
In conclusion, the exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam in Bengaluru has sparked a major row, with pro-Kannada groups and leaders condemning the move as a “technical injustice” designed to favour Hindi-speaking candidates over local ones. The controversy highlights the need for a more nuanced and inclusive approach to language policy in India, and it raises important questions about the commitment of the central government to promoting the use of local languages in official transactions.
The issue also highlights the importance of linguistic diversity in India, and the need to promote and protect the linguistic rights of all communities. The use of language is an important aspect of Indian culture and identity, and it is essential that the government takes a more inclusive and sensitive approach to language policy in order to promote social cohesion and linguistic diversity.
As the controversy continues to simmer, it remains to be seen how the central government will respond to the demands of pro-Kannada groups and leaders. However, one thing is clear: the exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam is a clear example of the need for a more nuanced and inclusive approach to language policy in India, and it highlights the importance of promoting and protecting the linguistic rights of all communities.
About the Author
