Kannada language excluded from railway exam in B’luru, sparks row
The city of Bengaluru, which is the capital of Karnataka, a state in southern India, has been at the center of a controversy surrounding the exclusion of the Kannada language from a railway exam. The South Western Railway, which operates in the region, conducted an exam recently, but to the surprise and dismay of many, Kannada was not included as a medium of examination. Instead, only Hindi and English were allowed, sparking sharp protests from pro-Kannada groups who feel that the decision reflects a systemic bias designed to favor Hindi-speaking people over local candidates.
The issue has triggered a heated debate, with many questioning the rationale behind excluding Kannada, which is the official language of Karnataka, from the exam. The fact that the exam was conducted in Bengaluru, a city where Kannada is widely spoken, has only added to the outrage. Pro-Kannada groups have accused the railway authorities of being insensitive to the linguistic sentiments of the people of Karnataka and of trying to impose Hindi on them.
BJP leader CT Ravi has weighed in on the issue, calling it a “technical injustice”. He has argued that the exclusion of Kannada from the exam is not only unfair but also goes against the principles of linguistic diversity and inclusivity. Ravi has demanded that the railway authorities take immediate action to rectify the situation and include Kannada as a medium of examination in all future exams.
The controversy has also sparked a wider debate about the role of language in public examinations and the need for greater sensitivity towards linguistic diversity. Many have argued that exams should be conducted in the local language, especially in states where the language is an integral part of the culture and identity. This, they argue, would not only make the exam more accessible to local candidates but also promote linguistic diversity and inclusivity.
The issue has also raised questions about the implementation of language policies in India. The country has a long history of linguistic diversity, with 22 officially recognized languages, including Kannada. However, despite the importance of language in Indian culture and identity, there have been instances of linguistic bias and discrimination. The exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam has been seen as a manifestation of this bias, with many arguing that it reflects a broader attempt to impose Hindi on non-Hindi speaking states.
The railway authorities have yet to respond to the controversy, but the issue is unlikely to die down anytime soon. Pro-Kannada groups have vowed to continue their protests, demanding that the authorities take immediate action to include Kannada as a medium of examination. The issue has also sparked a wider debate about language policies and the need for greater sensitivity towards linguistic diversity.
In the meantime, the people of Karnataka are waiting with bated breath to see how the issue will be resolved. Will the railway authorities bow to pressure and include Kannada as a medium of examination, or will they stick to their guns and continue to conduct exams only in Hindi and English? Only time will tell, but one thing is certain – the issue has sparked a heated debate about language, identity, and inclusivity, and it is unlikely to be forgotten anytime soon.
As the controversy continues to simmer, it is worth remembering that language is an integral part of our culture and identity. It is what defines us, what sets us apart, and what brings us together. The exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam may seem like a small issue, but it has sparked a wider debate about the importance of language in our lives. It is a reminder that language is not just a means of communication, but also a symbol of our identity, our culture, and our heritage.
In conclusion, the exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam in Bengaluru has sparked a row, with many arguing that it reflects a systemic bias designed to favor Hindi-speaking people over local candidates. The issue has triggered sharp protests from pro-Kannada groups, who have accused the railway authorities of being insensitive to the linguistic sentiments of the people of Karnataka. As the controversy continues to simmer, it is worth remembering the importance of language in our lives and the need for greater sensitivity towards linguistic diversity.
About the Author
