Kannada language excluded from railway exam in B’luru, sparks row
The recent decision by the South Western Railway to exclude Kannada as a medium for an exam conducted in Bengaluru has sparked a major row in the city. The exam, which was conducted with only Hindi and English as the allowed languages, has triggered sharp protests from pro-Kannada groups who claim that the decision reflects a systemic bias designed to favour Hindi-speaking people over local candidates.
The controversy began when the South Western Railway announced that the exam would be conducted in Hindi and English, with no option for Kannada, the official language of Karnataka. This move was seen as a blatant disregard for the linguistic and cultural heritage of the state, and pro-Kannada groups were quick to condemn the decision.
BJP leader CT Ravi was among those who criticized the move, calling it a “technical injustice”. He argued that the exclusion of Kannada as a medium for the exam was unfair and would put local candidates at a disadvantage. Ravi’s comments were echoed by other pro-Kannada groups, who claimed that the decision was a deliberate attempt to suppress the use of Kannada and promote Hindi instead.
The row has highlighted the long-standing debate over the use of language in official contexts in India. While Hindi is the official language of the country, many states have their own official languages, and there is often a tension between the use of Hindi and the local language. In Karnataka, Kannada is the official language, and there is a strong sense of pride and identity associated with the language.
The exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam has been seen as a threat to this identity, and pro-Kannada groups have argued that it is essential to promote the use of Kannada in all official contexts. They have also pointed out that the use of Hindi and English as the only allowed languages for the exam would put local candidates at a disadvantage, as many of them may not be proficient in these languages.
The controversy has also sparked a wider debate about the role of language in education and employment. While some argue that the use of Hindi and English is necessary for national integration and economic development, others claim that it is essential to promote the use of local languages to preserve cultural heritage and promote social justice.
In recent years, there have been several instances of language-related controversies in India, with many states demanding greater recognition and promotion of their local languages. The row over the railway exam in Bengaluru is just the latest example of this trend, and it highlights the need for a more nuanced and inclusive approach to language policy in India.
As the controversy continues to simmer, it remains to be seen how the South Western Railway will respond to the criticism. While the railway authorities have not yet commented on the issue, it is likely that they will face pressure to reconsider their decision and include Kannada as a medium for future exams.
In the meantime, pro-Kannada groups will continue to protest and demand greater recognition for their language. The row over the railway exam has sparked a wider debate about the importance of language and culture in India, and it is likely that this debate will continue to simmer in the days and weeks to come.
The incident has also raised questions about the implementation of language policies in India. While the country has a long history of linguistic diversity, there is often a tension between the use of Hindi and local languages. The exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam has highlighted the need for a more inclusive approach to language policy, one that recognizes and promotes the use of local languages in all official contexts.
As the controversy continues to unfold, it is essential to consider the broader implications of language policy in India. The row over the railway exam in Bengaluru is just one example of the many language-related controversies that have erupted in recent years, and it highlights the need for a more nuanced and inclusive approach to language policy.
In conclusion, the exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam in Bengaluru has sparked a major row, with pro-Kannada groups protesting against the decision and demanding greater recognition for their language. The controversy has highlighted the need for a more inclusive approach to language policy in India, one that recognizes and promotes the use of local languages in all official contexts. As the debate continues to simmer, it remains to be seen how the South Western Railway will respond to the criticism, and what implications this will have for language policy in India.
About the Author
