Kannada language excluded from railway exam in B’luru, sparks row
The city of Bengaluru, known for its rich cultural heritage and linguistic diversity, has been at the center of a controversy that has sparked sharp protests from pro-Kannada groups. The South Western Railway recently conducted an exam in the city, but with a glaring omission – the Kannada language was excluded as a medium, with only Hindi and English allowed. This move has triggered a row, with many questioning the logic behind the decision and alleging a systemic bias designed to favor Hindi-speaking candidates over local ones.
The exam, which was held for various posts in the railway department, had only Hindi and English as the medium of instruction, leaving out Kannada, the official language of Karnataka. This has led to widespread outrage, with pro-Kannada groups and politicians condemning the move as an attempt to suppress the local language and culture. The issue has also raised questions about the sensitivity of the railway authorities towards the linguistic diversity of the region.
BJP leader CT Ravi has termed the issue a “technical injustice” and has demanded that the railway authorities take immediate action to rectify the situation. He has also questioned the logic behind excluding Kannada, which is the official language of the state, from the exam. “Is Bengaluru not in Karnataka?” he asked, highlighting the absurdity of the situation.
The controversy has also sparked a debate about the importance of promoting local languages and cultures. Pro-Kannada groups have argued that the exclusion of Kannada from the exam is a clear indication of the systemic bias that exists in the country, where Hindi and English are often given precedence over local languages. They have demanded that the railway authorities take steps to promote the use of Kannada and other local languages in official communications and exams.
The issue has also raised concerns about the impact on local candidates who may not be proficient in Hindi or English. Many have argued that the exclusion of Kannada from the exam will put local candidates at a disadvantage, as they may not be able to express themselves effectively in languages that are not their mother tongue. This, in turn, could lead to a situation where local candidates are denied opportunities, despite being eligible and qualified for the posts.
The row has also highlighted the need for greater sensitivity and awareness about linguistic diversity in the country. India is a multilingual country, with 22 official languages and numerous dialects. However, despite this diversity, there is often a tendency to impose Hindi and English as the dominant languages, ignoring the importance of local languages and cultures.
In recent years, there have been several instances of linguistic controversies in the country, with many states demanding greater recognition and promotion of their local languages. The issue of language has also become a highly politicized one, with many parties using it as a tool to mobilize support and create divisions.
In the context of the railway exam controversy, it is clear that the exclusion of Kannada was a thoughtless and insensitive decision. The railway authorities should have been more mindful of the linguistic diversity of the region and taken steps to promote the use of Kannada and other local languages. By excluding Kannada, the authorities have sent a wrong message, which has sparked outrage and protests from pro-Kannada groups.
The controversy has also highlighted the need for greater accountability and transparency in the functioning of government departments and institutions. The railway authorities should have been more transparent about their decision-making process and taken steps to consult with local stakeholders and experts before taking a decision that has far-reaching consequences.
In conclusion, the exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam in Bengaluru is a regrettable incident that has sparked a row and highlighted the need for greater sensitivity and awareness about linguistic diversity. The railway authorities should take immediate action to rectify the situation and promote the use of Kannada and other local languages in official communications and exams. The issue has also raised important questions about the importance of promoting local languages and cultures, and the need for greater accountability and transparency in the functioning of government departments and institutions.
About the Author
