Kannada language excluded from railway exam in B’luru, sparks row
The city of Bengaluru, known for its vibrant culture and rich heritage, has been at the center of a controversy that has sparked sharp protests from pro-Kannada groups. The issue revolves around the exclusion of the Kannada language as a medium from an exam conducted by the South Western Railway in Bengaluru. The exam, which was held recently, allowed only Hindi and English as the medium of instruction, leaving out the local language of Kannada. This move has triggered a heated debate, with many calling it a systemic bias designed to favor Hindi-speaking people over local candidates.
The controversy began when the South Western Railway, which is responsible for conducting exams for various positions, announced that the exam would be conducted only in Hindi and English. This decision was met with widespread criticism from pro-Kannada groups, who argued that the exclusion of Kannada was a deliberate attempt to marginalize the local language and favor candidates from other parts of the country. The groups pointed out that Bengaluru is the capital of Karnataka, a state where Kannada is the official language, and it is only logical that the language should be included as a medium of instruction in any exam conducted in the state.
The issue has also drawn the attention of local politicians, with BJP leader CT Ravi calling it a “technical injustice”. Ravi, who is known for his outspoken views on issues related to the Kannada language and culture, argued that the decision to exclude Kannada from the exam was a clear example of the bias that exists in the system. He pointed out that the exam was being conducted in Bengaluru, which is a part of Karnataka, and it was only fair that the local language should be included as a medium of instruction.
The controversy has also sparked a wider debate about the role of language in education and employment. Many argue that the exclusion of Kannada from the exam is a reflection of a larger problem, where the local language is often marginalized in favor of more “widely spoken” languages like Hindi and English. This, they argue, is a systemic bias that perpetuates the dominance of certain languages over others, and can have far-reaching consequences for the cultural and linguistic diversity of the country.
Pro-Kannada groups have been protesting the decision, demanding that the South Western Railway include Kannada as a medium of instruction in the exam. They have also called for a wider recognition of the importance of the Kannada language and culture, arguing that it is essential to preserve the linguistic diversity of the country. The groups have organized rallies and demonstrations, and have also submitted memorandums to the concerned authorities, demanding that the decision be reversed.
The issue has also drawn attention to the larger question of language politics in India. The country is home to a diverse range of languages, each with its own unique culture and history. However, the dominance of certain languages, particularly Hindi and English, has often led to the marginalization of other languages. This has resulted in a situation where many languages are struggling to survive, and the cultural diversity of the country is under threat.
In conclusion, the exclusion of the Kannada language from the railway exam in Bengaluru has sparked a row that goes beyond the issue of language itself. It reflects a deeper systemic bias that perpetuates the dominance of certain languages over others, and can have far-reaching consequences for the cultural and linguistic diversity of the country. The issue has sparked sharp protests from pro-Kannada groups, who are demanding that the decision be reversed and the local language be included as a medium of instruction in the exam. As the debate continues, it is essential to recognize the importance of preserving the linguistic diversity of the country, and to work towards a more inclusive and equitable language policy.
The controversy surrounding the railway exam has highlighted the need for a more nuanced understanding of language politics in India. It is essential to recognize that language is not just a means of communication, but also a reflection of culture, history, and identity. The exclusion of the Kannada language from the exam is a reminder that the linguistic diversity of the country is under threat, and that it is essential to take steps to preserve and promote the local languages.
As the issue continues to simmer, it is likely that the debate will continue, with many arguing that the decision to exclude Kannada from the exam is a clear example of the bias that exists in the system. The controversy has sparked a wider discussion about the role of language in education and employment, and the need for a more inclusive and equitable language policy. It remains to be seen how the issue will be resolved, but one thing is clear: the exclusion of the Kannada language from the railway exam has sparked a row that will have far-reaching consequences for the linguistic diversity of the country.
About the Author
