Haryana Govt’s Act Helps Rape Convict Ram Rahim Get Repeated Parole
The Haryana government’s latest legislation, the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022, has been making headlines for its provisions that allow convicted prisoners to be released on parole for a significant period. One of the beneficiaries of this law is none other than rape convict Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh, the head of the Dera Sacha Sauda sect. Ram Rahim, who has been serving his sentence since 2017, has been granted repeated parole, sparking controversy and outrage among many.
The Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022, is designed to provide relief to prisoners who have demonstrated good conduct during their incarceration. The law allows convicted prisoners to be released for 10 weeks each year, which can be further extended by the prison authorities. Moreover, the law also provides for the release of ‘hardcore convicted prisoners’ who have served at least five years of their sentence, including two years under trial. This provision is particularly significant, as it enables prisoners like Ram Rahim to receive regular parole, despite being convicted of serious crimes.
Ram Rahim, who was convicted of raping two of his female followers in 2017, has been serving his sentence at the Sunaria Jail in Rohtak, Haryana. Since he has been in jail for over five years, he qualifies for the provision under the new law, which allows him to receive regular parole. The parole is granted for a period of 10 weeks, during which time Ram Rahim is allowed to stay outside the prison premises. This has raised concerns among many, who question the wisdom of granting parole to a convicted rapist, especially one who has been accused of committing heinous crimes.
The Haryana government’s decision to introduce the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022, has been criticized by many, who argue that the law is too lenient and allows convicted prisoners to take advantage of the system. The law has been seen as a way to appease certain sections of society, particularly those with political influence. The fact that Ram Rahim, a high-profile convict, has been granted repeated parole under this law has only added fuel to the fire, with many questioning the government’s motives.
The issue of parole for convicted prisoners is a complex one, with different states having different laws and regulations governing the grant of parole. While the idea of granting parole to prisoners who have demonstrated good conduct is not new, the Haryana government’s law has been criticized for being too broad and allowing convicted prisoners to take advantage of the system. The fact that Ram Rahim, a convicted rapist, has been granted repeated parole under this law has only highlighted the need for a more nuanced approach to the issue of parole.
The Haryana government has defended the law, arguing that it is designed to provide relief to prisoners who have demonstrated good conduct during their incarceration. The government has also argued that the law is not intended to benefit any particular individual or group, but rather to provide a more humane approach to the treatment of prisoners. However, the fact that Ram Rahim, a high-profile convict, has been granted repeated parole under this law has only raised questions about the government’s motives and the effectiveness of the law.
In conclusion, the Haryana government’s Act has helped rape convict Ram Rahim get repeated parole, sparking controversy and outrage among many. While the law is designed to provide relief to prisoners who have demonstrated good conduct, its provisions have been criticized for being too lenient and allowing convicted prisoners to take advantage of the system. The issue of parole for convicted prisoners is a complex one, and the Haryana government’s law has only highlighted the need for a more nuanced approach to the issue. As the debate over the law continues, one thing is clear: the grant of parole to convicted prisoners like Ram Rahim will remain a contentious issue, with many questioning the wisdom of allowing such individuals to walk free, even if only for a short period.
About the Author
