Haryana Govt’s Act helps rape convict Ram Rahim get repeated parole
The Haryana government’s recent legislation, the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022, has been making headlines for its provisions that allow convicted prisoners to be released on parole. One of the most notable beneficiaries of this law is rape convict Ram Rahim, who has been in jail since 2017. The Act has sparked controversy, with many questioning how a convicted rapist can be granted repeated parole.
At the heart of the issue is the provision that allows convicted prisoners to be released for 10 weeks each year. This provision is applicable to all prisoners, including those who have been convicted of serious crimes like rape. Furthermore, the law also allows ‘hardcore convicted prisoners’ who have served at least five years of their sentence, including two years under trial, to receive regular parole. Since Ram Rahim has been in jail since 2017, he qualifies for this provision, despite being a convicted rapist.
The implications of this law are far-reaching and have significant consequences for the victims of rape and their families. The fact that a convicted rapist like Ram Rahim can be granted repeated parole raises serious concerns about the safety and well-being of the community. It also undermines the faith of the people in the justice system, which is supposed to protect them from harm.
The Haryana government’s decision to introduce this law has been criticized by many, who argue that it is too lenient and allows convicted criminals to escape accountability. The law has also been questioned by legal experts, who point out that it may be unconstitutional and violate the principles of natural justice.
One of the most disturbing aspects of this law is that it does not take into account the nature of the crime committed by the prisoner. A convicted rapist like Ram Rahim is treated the same as any other prisoner, without any consideration for the gravity of his offense. This raises serious questions about the government’s commitment to protecting the rights of victims and ensuring that justice is served.
The case of Ram Rahim is a classic example of how this law can be misused. Despite being a convicted rapist, he has been granted repeated parole, which has allowed him to move freely and interact with his followers. This has caused significant concern among the people, who fear that he may use his freedom to influence witnesses or intimidate victims.
The Haryana government’s decision to introduce this law has also been criticized by women’s rights groups, who argue that it undermines the efforts to combat violence against women. The law sends a wrong message to the society, that rape is not a serious crime and that convicted rapists can be granted parole and released back into the community.
In conclusion, the Haryana government’s Act has helped rape convict Ram Rahim get repeated parole, raising serious concerns about the safety and well-being of the community. The law’s provisions, which allow convicted prisoners to be released for 10 weeks each year and grant regular parole to ‘hardcore convicted prisoners’, are too lenient and undermine the faith of the people in the justice system. The government must revisit this law and ensure that it is amended to prioritize the rights of victims and the safety of the community.
The fact that a convicted rapist like Ram Rahim can be granted repeated parole is a stark reminder of the flaws in our justice system. It highlights the need for a more robust and effective system that prioritizes the rights of victims and ensures that justice is served. The Haryana government must take immediate action to address these concerns and ensure that the law is amended to reflect the gravity of the crimes committed by prisoners like Ram Rahim.
The controversy surrounding Ram Rahim’s parole has also raised questions about the role of the government in ensuring that justice is served. The government’s decision to introduce this law has been criticized by many, who argue that it is a clear example of the government’s failure to prioritize the rights of victims. The government must take responsibility for its actions and ensure that the law is amended to reflect the concerns of the people.
In the end, the Haryana government’s Act has helped rape convict Ram Rahim get repeated parole, but it has also raised significant concerns about the safety and well-being of the community. The law’s provisions are too lenient and undermine the faith of the people in the justice system. The government must revisit this law and ensure that it is amended to prioritize the rights of victims and the safety of the community.
About the Author
