HC Rejects TN Govt’s Plea Against Lighting Holy ‘Deep’ Near Dargah
In a significant development, the Madras High Court on Thursday dismissed the Tamil Nadu government’s appeal against the court’s order directing to light a holy ‘deep’ near a dargah. The court’s decision comes after the state government had filed an appeal against the earlier order, which had allowed devotees to light a holy ‘deep’ near the dargah located at the foot of the Thiruparankundram hill in Tamil Nadu.
The controversy surrounding the lighting of the holy ‘deep’ near the dargah has been ongoing for some time now. The court had earlier directed the authorities to allow devotees to light the ‘deep’ near the dargah, but the state government had opposed the move, citing concerns about law and order. However, the court has now rejected the government’s appeal, stating that it was filed with an “ulterior motive”.
The court’s order is a significant victory for the devotees who had been seeking permission to light the holy ‘deep’ near the dargah. The ‘deep’ is a sacred lamp that is an integral part of Hindu worship, and devotees had been seeking to light it near the dargah as a mark of respect and devotion. However, the state government had opposed the move, citing concerns about the potential for communal tensions.
The court’s decision to reject the government’s appeal is a significant blow to the state government’s efforts to restrict the lighting of the holy ‘deep’ near the dargah. The court has made it clear that the government’s appeal was motivated by ulterior motives, and that the decision to allow the lighting of the ‘deep’ was taken in the interests of religious freedom and the rights of devotees.
The controversy surrounding the lighting of the holy ‘deep’ near the dargah has been ongoing for some time now, with both the state government and the devotees locked in a bitter dispute. The state government had argued that allowing the lighting of the ‘deep’ near the dargah could lead to communal tensions and law and order problems. However, the devotees had argued that they had a right to practice their religion and that the lighting of the ‘deep’ was an essential part of their worship.
The court’s decision to allow the lighting of the holy ‘deep’ near the dargah is a significant victory for the devotees, who had been seeking to practice their religion without restriction. The court has made it clear that the right to religious freedom is a fundamental right, and that the state government cannot restrict this right without justification.
The dispute over the lighting of the holy ‘deep’ near the dargah has also raised questions about the role of the state government in regulating religious practices. The state government had argued that it had a duty to maintain law and order, and that allowing the lighting of the ‘deep’ near the dargah could lead to communal tensions. However, the court has made it clear that the state government’s role is to protect the rights of all citizens, including the right to religious freedom.
In this context, the court’s decision to reject the state government’s appeal is a significant development. The court has made it clear that the state government’s efforts to restrict the lighting of the holy ‘deep’ near the dargah were motivated by ulterior motives, and that the decision to allow the lighting of the ‘deep’ was taken in the interests of religious freedom and the rights of devotees.
The dispute over the lighting of the holy ‘deep’ near the dargah has also highlighted the need for greater understanding and tolerance between different religious communities. The controversy surrounding the lighting of the ‘deep’ has been fueled by communal tensions and mistrust, and it is essential that efforts are made to promote greater understanding and respect between different religious communities.
In conclusion, the Madras High Court’s decision to reject the Tamil Nadu government’s appeal against the lighting of the holy ‘deep’ near the dargah is a significant development. The court’s decision is a victory for the devotees who had been seeking to practice their religion without restriction, and it highlights the importance of protecting the right to religious freedom. The decision also raises questions about the role of the state government in regulating religious practices, and it emphasizes the need for greater understanding and tolerance between different religious communities.
About the Author
