HC Rejects TN Govt’s Plea Against Lighting Holy ‘Deep’ Near Dargah
In a significant development, the Madras High Court on Thursday dismissed the Tamil Nadu government’s appeal against the court’s order directing to light a holy ‘deep’ near a dargah. The court’s decision comes after the state government had appealed against the earlier order, which had directed the lighting of the holy ‘deep’ near the dargah at Thiruparankundram Hill. The court, while dismissing the appeal, observed that it was filed with an “ulterior motive”.
The controversy surrounding the lighting of the holy ‘deep’ near the dargah began when a group of devotees sought permission to light the ‘deep’ as part of their religious rituals. However, the state government had opposed the move, citing concerns about law and order and potential disturbance to the peaceful environment of the dargah. Despite the court’s initial order directing the lighting of the ‘deep’, the diya was not lit at the designated spot. Instead, it was lit at another location, prompting the court to take a stern view of the matter.
The Madras High Court’s decision to dismiss the state government’s appeal is significant, as it upholds the right of devotees to practice their religion and perform their rituals without undue interference from the state. The court’s observation that the appeal was filed with an “ulterior motive” suggests that the state government’s opposition to the lighting of the ‘deep’ was not entirely driven by concerns about law and order, but may have been motivated by other factors.
The incident highlights the complex and often contentious relationship between the state and religious communities in India. While the state has a responsibility to maintain law and order and ensure public safety, it must also respect the fundamental rights of citizens to practice their religion and culture. In this case, the court’s decision suggests that the state government’s actions were not justified, and that the devotees have the right to light the holy ‘deep’ near the dargah as part of their religious rituals.
The controversy surrounding the lighting of the ‘deep’ near the dargah is not an isolated incident. There have been several instances in recent years where the state government has been accused of interfering with the religious practices of minority communities. The incident highlights the need for the state to be more sensitive and respectful of the rights of all citizens, regardless of their religion or community.
The Madras High Court’s decision is also significant because it underscores the importance of the judiciary in protecting the fundamental rights of citizens. The court’s role in upholding the rule of law and ensuring that the state does not overstep its authority is critical in a democracy. In this case, the court’s decision sends a strong message that the state cannot arbitrarily restrict the religious freedoms of citizens, and that the judiciary will intervene to protect these rights when necessary.
In conclusion, the Madras High Court’s decision to dismiss the Tamil Nadu government’s appeal against the lighting of the holy ‘deep’ near the dargah is a significant development that upholds the right of devotees to practice their religion and perform their rituals without undue interference from the state. The incident highlights the complex and often contentious relationship between the state and religious communities in India, and underscores the importance of the judiciary in protecting the fundamental rights of citizens. As the state government considers its next move, it must be mindful of the need to respect the rights of all citizens, regardless of their religion or community.
The controversy surrounding the lighting of the ‘deep’ near the dargah is a reminder that the relationship between the state and religious communities in India is complex and multifaceted. While the state has a responsibility to maintain law and order and ensure public safety, it must also respect the fundamental rights of citizens to practice their religion and culture. The Madras High Court’s decision is a significant step towards upholding these rights, and ensuring that the state does not overstep its authority.
As the debate surrounding the lighting of the ‘deep’ near the dargah continues, it is essential to consider the broader implications of the incident. The controversy highlights the need for greater understanding and respect between different religious communities in India, and underscores the importance of the state in promoting social cohesion and protecting the rights of all citizens. Ultimately, the Madras High Court’s decision is a significant step towards upholding the fundamental rights of citizens, and ensuring that the state respects the rights of all citizens to practice their religion and culture.
About the Author
