HC rejects TN govt’s plea against lighting holy ‘deep’ near dargah
In a significant development, the Madras High Court on Thursday dismissed the Tamil Nadu government’s appeal against the court’s order directing to light a holy ‘deep’ near a dargah. The court’s decision comes after the state government had filed an appeal against the earlier order, which had directed the authorities to allow the lighting of a holy ‘deep’ near the dargah located near the Thiruparankundram hill. The court, while dismissing the appeal, observed that it was filed with an “ulterior motive”.
The controversy surrounding the lighting of the holy ‘deep’ near the dargah had been ongoing for some time. The devotees had been seeking permission to light the ‘deep’ near the dargah, which is a sacred place for Muslims. However, the state government had been opposing the move, citing concerns about law and order. The matter had reached the Madras High Court, which had earlier directed the authorities to allow the lighting of the ‘deep’ near the dargah.
However, despite the court’s direction, the ‘deep’ was not lit at the designated spot. Instead, it was lit at another location, which had led to the state government filing an appeal against the court’s order. The government had argued that the lighting of the ‘deep’ near the dargah would lead to communal tensions and disturb the peace in the area.
But the Madras High Court was not convinced with the government’s arguments. The court observed that the appeal was filed with an “ulterior motive” and dismissed it. The court’s decision is a significant victory for the devotees who had been seeking to light the holy ‘deep’ near the dargah.
The controversy surrounding the lighting of the holy ‘deep’ near the dargah is not an isolated incident. It is part of a larger debate about the balance between religious freedom and communal harmony. The issue has sparked a heated debate, with some arguing that the lighting of the ‘deep’ near the dargah is a matter of religious freedom, while others argue that it could lead to communal tensions.
The Madras High Court’s decision is a significant milestone in this debate. The court’s observation that the appeal was filed with an “ulterior motive” suggests that the government’s opposition to the lighting of the ‘deep’ near the dargah was not entirely driven by concerns about law and order. The court’s decision highlights the need for the government to balance its concerns about communal harmony with the need to protect religious freedom.
The issue also raises questions about the role of the state in regulating religious practices. While the state has a responsibility to maintain law and order, it also has a duty to protect the rights of citizens to practice their faith. The Madras High Court’s decision suggests that the state cannot use concerns about law and order as a pretext to restrict religious freedom.
In conclusion, the Madras High Court’s decision to dismiss the Tamil Nadu government’s appeal against the lighting of a holy ‘deep’ near a dargah is a significant development. The court’s observation that the appeal was filed with an “ulterior motive” highlights the need for the government to be transparent and honest in its dealings with citizens. The decision also underscores the importance of balancing religious freedom with communal harmony. As the debate about the role of the state in regulating religious practices continues, the Madras High Court’s decision will be an important reference point.
The Madras High Court’s decision is also a reminder that the judiciary plays a critical role in protecting the rights of citizens. The court’s ability to hold the government accountable for its actions is a vital check on the power of the state. In this case, the court’s decision has ensured that the rights of devotees to practice their faith are protected.
As the matter stands, the lighting of the holy ‘deep’ near the dargah will likely go ahead, despite the state government’s opposition. The devotees will be able to practice their faith without fear of persecution or restriction. The Madras High Court’s decision is a victory for religious freedom and a reminder that the state must balance its concerns about law and order with the need to protect the rights of citizens.
In the end, the Madras High Court’s decision is a testament to the strength of India’s democratic institutions. The court’s ability to hold the government accountable for its actions is a vital component of a healthy democracy. As the country continues to grapple with the challenges of balancing religious freedom with communal harmony, the Madras High Court’s decision will be an important reference point.
About the Author
