HC rejects TN govt’s plea against lighting holy ‘deep’ near dargah
The Madras High Court on Thursday made a significant ruling, dismissing the Tamil Nadu government’s appeal against the court’s order directing to light a holy ‘deep’ near a dargah. The court’s decision was straightforward, stating that “the appeal, filed with an ulterior motive, is dismissed.” This development comes on the heels of a controversy surrounding the lighting of a diya (earthen lamp) near the dargah, which was not lit at the designated spot after the court’s initial direction. Instead, it was lit at another location, sparking a heated debate and prompting the government to file an appeal.
To understand the context of this ruling, it is essential to delve into the background of the case. The dispute revolves around a dargah located near the Thiruparankundram hill, a site of significant cultural and religious importance in Tamil Nadu. The dargah, a shrine dedicated to a Sufi saint, has been a place of worship and pilgrimage for Muslims for centuries. However, the area is also home to a temple, and the proximity of these two religious sites has been a point of contention.
The controversy began when a group of devotees sought to light a holy ‘deep’ near the dargah, which was met with resistance from the state government. The government’s stance was that lighting the diya would disturb the peace and create communal tension. However, the court intervened, directing the authorities to allow the devotees to light the diya near the dargah. Despite this order, the diya was not lit at the designated spot, and instead, it was lit at another location, away from the dargah.
The government’s decision to file an appeal against the court’s order was seen as an attempt to circumvent the ruling and maintain the status quo. However, the High Court was not convinced by the government’s arguments and dismissed the appeal, terming it as “filed with an ulterior motive.” This ruling is significant, as it upholds the rights of devotees to practice their faith and reinforces the principle of religious freedom.
The court’s decision has been welcomed by the devotees, who see it as a victory for their right to worship. The ruling is also being hailed as a testament to the independence of the judiciary, which has once again demonstrated its commitment to upholding the Constitution and protecting the rights of citizens.
However, the controversy surrounding the lighting of the diya near the dargah is far from over. The state government’s actions have been criticized by many, who see them as an attempt to appease a particular community and maintain a fragile peace. The fact that the diya was not lit at the designated spot, despite the court’s order, raises questions about the government’s commitment to the rule of law and its willingness to uphold the rights of all citizens.
The dispute also highlights the complexities of managing religious diversity in India. The country is home to a multitude of faiths, and the coexistence of different religious communities is often a delicate balancing act. The government’s role in maintaining communal harmony is crucial, but it must also ensure that the rights of all citizens are protected and respected.
In conclusion, the Madras High Court’s ruling is a significant development in the controversy surrounding the lighting of a holy ‘deep’ near the dargah. The court’s decision to dismiss the government’s appeal is a testament to its commitment to upholding the rights of citizens and protecting the principles of religious freedom. However, the dispute is far from over, and it remains to be seen how the state government will respond to the court’s ruling. One thing is certain, though – the judiciary has once again demonstrated its independence and its willingness to stand up for the rights of citizens, regardless of their faith or background.
About the Author
