Chance of influencing witnesses after bail in POCSO cases real: SC
The Supreme Court of India has recently expressed its concern over the likelihood of evidence tampering and influencing witnesses after the grant of bail in cases involving sexual assault against children under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. This concern was raised as the court cancelled the bail granted by the Allahabad High Court to a youth from Shamli in Uttar Pradesh, accused of repeated penetrative sexual assault under armed intimidation of a minor.
The POCSO Act, which was enacted in 2012, is a comprehensive law that aims to protect children from sexual abuse, exploitation, and pornography. The Act provides for severe penalties for offenders, including imprisonment and fine. However, despite the stringent provisions of the Act, there have been instances where accused persons have been granted bail, raising concerns about the potential for evidence tampering and influencing witnesses.
The Supreme Court’s concern is legitimate and grave, as the likelihood of evidence tampering and influencing witnesses is very real in POCSO cases. In many cases, the accused persons may have connections with the local community, and may try to influence the witnesses or tamper with evidence to escape punishment. This can be particularly challenging in cases where the victims are minors, and may not have the courage to testify against their abusers.
The case in question involved a youth from Shamli in Uttar Pradesh, who was accused of repeated penetrative sexual assault under armed intimidation of a minor. The Allahabad High Court had granted bail to the accused person, which was later challenged in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, while cancelling the bail, observed that the likelihood of evidence tampering and influencing witnesses was a legitimate and grave concern in POCSO cases.
The Supreme Court’s decision is a significant one, as it highlights the need for caution when granting bail in POCSO cases. The court’s concern is not just about the accused person’s potential to influence witnesses or tamper with evidence, but also about the potential impact on the victim and their family. In many cases, the victims of sexual abuse may have already suffered trauma and distress, and the possibility of the accused person being granted bail can exacerbate their suffering.
The POCSO Act provides for a range of measures to protect victims and witnesses, including the provision of counseling and support services. However, more needs to be done to ensure that the rights of victims are protected, and that the accused persons are held accountable for their crimes. The Supreme Court’s decision is a step in the right direction, as it recognizes the need for caution when granting bail in POCSO cases.
The decision also highlights the need for greater awareness and sensitivity among law enforcement agencies and the judiciary when dealing with POCSO cases. The police and the prosecution must be trained to handle these cases with sensitivity and care, and must be aware of the potential for evidence tampering and influencing witnesses. The judiciary must also be vigilant and ensure that the rights of victims are protected, and that the accused persons are held accountable for their crimes.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s decision to cancel the bail granted to the accused person in a POCSO case is a significant one, as it highlights the need for caution when granting bail in such cases. The likelihood of evidence tampering and influencing witnesses is a legitimate and grave concern in POCSO cases, and the court’s decision recognizes this concern. The decision is a step in the right direction, as it prioritizes the protection of victims and the integrity of the justice system.
As the Supreme Court has noted, the POCSO Act is a comprehensive law that aims to protect children from sexual abuse, exploitation, and pornography. However, the implementation of the Act requires greater awareness and sensitivity among law enforcement agencies and the judiciary. The decision to cancel the bail granted to the accused person is a reminder that the justice system must prioritize the protection of victims, and must ensure that the accused persons are held accountable for their crimes.
The Supreme Court’s decision is also a reminder that the POCSO Act is not just a law, but a tool for social change. The Act aims to create a society where children are safe from sexual abuse, exploitation, and pornography. However, this requires a broader cultural shift, where children are valued and respected, and where their rights are protected.
In the end, the Supreme Court’s decision is a significant one, as it highlights the need for caution when granting bail in POCSO cases. The decision recognizes the legitimate and grave concern of evidence tampering and influencing witnesses, and prioritizes the protection of victims and the integrity of the justice system.
About the Author
