Attack on Federalism: Kerala CM on Bills to Remove Jailed PM, CMs
The recent developments in the Indian political landscape have sent shockwaves across the country, with the ruling party introducing a bill that seeks to remove Prime Ministers, Chief Ministers, and Ministers from office if they are arrested or detained for at least 30 days. The Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill, 2025, has been tabled in the Parliament, sparking intense debate and criticism from opposition parties and state governments.
Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan has been one of the most vocal critics of the bill, terming it a “blatant attack on federalism and the rights of states.” In a statement, Vijayan said that the bill seeks to destabilize non-BJP governments by weaponizing central agencies and jailing opponents on false charges.
The bill, if passed, would allow the Centre to remove PM, CMs, and Ministers from office if they are arrested or detained for at least 30 days. This would give the Centre unprecedented powers to intervene in the functioning of state governments and undermine the federal structure of the country.
Vijayan’s statement highlights the grave concerns about the bill’s implications on the country’s democratic fabric. “This bill is a clear attempt to undermine the federal structure of our country and the rights of states. It seeks to create a situation where central agencies can arrest and detain opposition leaders on false charges, thereby destabilizing non-BJP governments,” he said.
The Kerala CM’s concerns are not unfounded. The bill, if passed, would give the Centre immense powers to interfere in the functioning of state governments. It would allow the Centre to remove PM, CMs, and Ministers from office without any checks and balances, thereby undermining the principle of federalism.
Federalism is a cornerstone of India’s democratic system, which ensures that power is distributed among the Centre and the states. The Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill, 2025, seeks to undermine this principle by giving the Centre unparalleled powers to intervene in the functioning of state governments.
The bill’s implications are far-reaching and would have severe consequences for the country’s democratic system. It would create a situation where central agencies can arrest and detain opposition leaders on false charges, thereby destabilizing non-BJP governments. This would undermine the principle of federalism and create a situation where the Centre has absolute power over the states.
Vijayan’s statement has been widely endorsed by opposition parties and state governments. The Congress, the Left parties, and other opposition parties have all criticized the bill, terming it an attack on federalism and the rights of states.
The situation is grave, and it is essential that the Centre and the opposition parties engage in a constructive dialogue to address the concerns raised by Vijayan and other opposition leaders. The Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill, 2025, needs to be reviewed and revised to ensure that it does not undermine the federal structure of the country.
In conclusion, the Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill, 2025, is a blatant attack on federalism and the rights of states. The bill seeks to destabilize non-BJP governments by weaponizing central agencies and jailing opponents on false charges. It is essential that the Centre and the opposition parties engage in a constructive dialogue to address the concerns raised by Vijayan and other opposition leaders. The bill needs to be reviewed and revised to ensure that it does not undermine the federal structure of the country.
Source:
