RGV Slams ‘Dog Lovers’ for Protesting Against SC’s Order
Filmmaker Ram Gopal Varma has sparked a controversy by slamming ‘dog lovers’ who are protesting against the Supreme Court’s order to shift Delhi-NCR’s stray dogs to shelter homes. Varma took to Twitter to express his thoughts on the matter, stating that the ‘dog lovers’ were more concerned about the well-being of animals than humans.
“All you Dog lovers are shouting hoarse about injustice to dogs regarding the Supreme Court’s order. But where were they when a four-year-old child was brutally killed in broad daylight on the streets (sic),” Varma tweeted.
The Supreme Court had recently ordered that stray dogs in Delhi-NCR be shifted to shelter homes, sparking widespread protests from animal lovers who claimed that the order was inhumane and would lead to the death of many innocent animals.
However, Varma’s tweet has sparked a debate, with many people questioning the priorities of those protesting against the SC’s order. Varma’s point is that while ‘dog lovers’ are concerned about the welfare of animals, they seem to be less concerned about the welfare of human beings.
This is not the first time that Varma has made headlines for his controversial statements. The filmmaker has been known to speak his mind on various issues, often sparking heated debates and controversies.
In this case, Varma’s statement has sparked a debate on social media, with many people defending the ‘dog lovers’ and criticizing Varma for his insensitive comments. However, there are also those who agree with Varma, arguing that the ‘dog lovers’ are being hypocritical by prioritizing the welfare of animals over humans.
The debate highlights the complexities of the issue. On one hand, stray dogs are a major problem in Delhi-NCR, with many of them being injured, sick, or even aggressive. On the other hand, the SC’s order has sparked concerns about the welfare of the animals, with many arguing that the shelter homes are inadequate and that the animals will be subjected to inhumane treatment.
The SC’s order was made in response to a petition filed by the Delhi government, which had sought to address the issue of stray dogs in the national capital. The court had ordered that the dogs be shifted to shelter homes, where they would receive proper care and attention.
However, the ‘dog lovers’ who are protesting against the SC’s order argue that the order is inhumane and that the shelter homes are not equipped to provide proper care to the animals. They claim that the order will lead to the death of many innocent animals and that it is a cruel and inhumane act.
Varma’s statement has sparked a debate on the priorities of those protesting against the SC’s order. While some argue that the ‘dog lovers’ are being hypocritical by prioritizing the welfare of animals over humans, others argue that the issue is more complex and that the SC’s order is not the solution to the problem.
The debate highlights the need for a more nuanced approach to addressing the issue of stray dogs in Delhi-NCR. While it is true that the SC’s order has sparked concerns about the welfare of the animals, it is also true that the issue of stray dogs is a complex one that requires a multi-faceted approach.
In conclusion, Varma’s statement has sparked a debate on the priorities of those protesting against the SC’s order. While some argue that the ‘dog lovers’ are being hypocritical by prioritizing the welfare of animals over humans, others argue that the issue is more complex and that the SC’s order is not the solution to the problem.
Ultimately, the debate highlights the need for a more nuanced approach to addressing the issue of stray dogs in Delhi-NCR. It is clear that the issue is complex and that a more comprehensive approach is needed to address the problem.
News Source:
