Madras HC sends Jana Nayagan-CBFC case back to single judge
The Madras High Court has recently made a significant decision in the ongoing case between the makers of Thalapathy Vijay’s upcoming film, Jana Nayagan, and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). In a surprising turn of events, the division bench of the court has set aside a single judge’s order that had directed the CBFC to grant a U/A 16+ certificate to the film. Instead, the matter has been sent back to the single judge for fresh consideration, with the court allowing the makers to amend their plea and challenge the CBFC chairperson’s order.
The case began when the CBFC refused to grant a U/A 16+ certificate to Jana Nayagan, citing certain objections to the film’s content. The makers of the film, who had been expecting a U/A 16+ certificate, were disappointed with the CBFC’s decision and decided to approach the Madras High Court for relief. The single judge who heard the case initially directed the CBFC to grant the certificate, but this order has now been set aside by the division bench.
The division bench’s decision to send the matter back to the single judge for fresh consideration is significant, as it indicates that the court is not satisfied with the way the case was handled initially. The court has asked the single judge to hear the case expeditiously, which means that the matter will be given priority and heard as soon as possible. This is likely to provide some relief to the makers of the film, who have been waiting anxiously for a decision on the certification of their film.
The court’s decision to allow the makers to amend their plea and challenge the CBFC chairperson’s order is also important. This means that the makers will have the opportunity to present their case again, with additional arguments and evidence, and challenge the CBFC’s decision to refuse a U/A 16+ certificate. This could potentially lead to a different outcome, with the court potentially directing the CBFC to grant the certificate or making some other order that is favorable to the makers.
The case highlights the ongoing tensions between the film industry and the CBFC, which has been accused of being overly cautious and restrictive in its certification decisions. The CBFC has the power to grant or refuse certification to films, and its decisions can have a significant impact on the commercial viability of a film. In recent years, there have been several instances of films being delayed or refused certification due to objections from the CBFC, leading to frustration and anger among filmmakers and producers.
The decision of the Madras High Court in the Jana Nayagan case is likely to be closely watched by the film industry, as it could have implications for other films that are pending certification. The court’s decision to send the matter back to the single judge for fresh consideration suggests that the judiciary is willing to intervene in cases where the CBFC’s decisions are perceived as unfair or arbitrary. This could provide some comfort to filmmakers and producers who feel that the CBFC is being overly restrictive or harsh in its certification decisions.
In conclusion, the Madras High Court’s decision to send the Jana Nayagan-CBFC case back to the single judge is a significant development that could have implications for the film industry. The court’s decision to allow the makers to amend their plea and challenge the CBFC chairperson’s order provides an opportunity for the makers to present their case again and potentially secure a favorable outcome. As the case continues to unfold, it will be interesting to see how the single judge handles the matter and what decision is ultimately made.
About the Author
