Madras HC sends Jana Nayagan-CBFC case back to single judge
The Madras High Court has made a significant decision in the ongoing case between the makers of Thalapathy Vijay’s upcoming film, Jana Nayagan, and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). In a recent development, a division bench of the Madras High Court has set aside a single judge’s order directing the CBFC to grant a U/A 16+ certificate to the film. Instead, the matter has been sent back to the single judge for fresh consideration, allowing the makers to amend their plea and challenge the CBFC chairperson’s order.
This decision comes as a significant setback for the film’s producers, who were hoping to obtain a certification for the film without any further delays. The CBFC had earlier refused to grant a U/A 16+ certificate to Jana Nayagan, citing certain objections to the film’s content. The film’s makers had then approached the Madras High Court, seeking a directive to the CBFC to grant the desired certification.
The single judge’s order, which was passed earlier, had directed the CBFC to grant a U/A 16+ certificate to the film. However, the CBFC had challenged this order before a division bench of the Madras High Court, arguing that the single judge had exceeded its jurisdiction in passing such an order. The division bench, after hearing the arguments of both parties, has now set aside the single judge’s order and sent the matter back for fresh consideration.
The division bench’s decision is significant, as it allows the film’s makers to amend their plea and challenge the CBFC chairperson’s order. This means that the makers will have to re-approach the single judge and argue their case afresh, taking into account the objections raised by the CBFC. The single judge will then have to hear the case expeditiously and pass a fresh order, taking into account the amended plea and the arguments advanced by both parties.
The decision of the Madras High Court is also significant, as it highlights the importance of following the proper procedure in cases involving film certification. The CBFC, as a statutory body, has the authority to grant certifications to films, and its decisions can only be challenged before a court of law. By setting aside the single judge’s order and sending the matter back for fresh consideration, the division bench has ensured that the proper procedure is followed, and the film’s makers are given a fair opportunity to argue their case.
The outcome of this case will be closely watched by the film industry, as it has significant implications for film certification in India. The CBFC’s role in granting certifications to films is crucial, and any decision that affects this process can have far-reaching consequences. The Madras High Court’s decision, in this case, is a significant development, and it remains to be seen how the case will unfold in the coming days.
In the meantime, the fate of Jana Nayagan remains uncertain, as the film’s certification is still pending. The film’s makers will have to re-approach the single judge and argue their case afresh, hoping to obtain the desired certification. The CBFC, on the other hand, will have to consider the film’s content and decide whether to grant a certification, taking into account the objections raised earlier.
As the case continues to unfold, one thing is certain – the Madras High Court’s decision has added a new twist to the saga, and the outcome will be closely watched by the film industry and fans of Thalapathy Vijay. The film’s certification is still pending, and it remains to be seen how the case will eventually be decided.
For now, the makers of Jana Nayagan will have to wait and see how the case unfolds, hoping that they will eventually obtain the desired certification. The CBFC, on the other hand, will have to consider the film’s content and decide whether to grant a certification, taking into account the objections raised earlier. The Madras High Court’s decision has added a new layer of complexity to the case, and it remains to be seen how the case will eventually be decided.
In conclusion, the Madras High Court’s decision to set aside the single judge’s order and send the matter back for fresh consideration is a significant development in the ongoing case between the makers of Jana Nayagan and the CBFC. The decision highlights the importance of following the proper procedure in cases involving film certification and gives the film’s makers a fresh opportunity to argue their case. The outcome of the case will be closely watched by the film industry, and it remains to be seen how the case will eventually be decided.
About the Author
