Hrithik Rejected Bunty Aur Babli Over ‘Small-Town’ Role: Shaad Ali
In an interesting revelation, director Shaad Ali has shared that Hrithik Roshan was initially chosen to play the lead role in the 2005 film “Bunty Aur Babli”, but he rejected the offer due to reservations about portraying a small-town con artist. The role eventually went to Abhishek Bachchan, who delivered a memorable performance as “Rakesh Trivedi”, also known as “Bunty”.
Speaking to News18, Shaad Ali revealed that Hrithik was the first choice for the film, and his father, Rakesh Roshan, was also keen for his son to sign the project. “Hrithik’s father liked the script, wanted his son to sign the film,” Shaad said. However, Hrithik had some reservations about the character and the story, which ultimately led to him rejecting the offer.
Shaad Ali explained that Hrithik’s concerns were related to the character’s background and the fact that he was a small-town con artist. “Hrithik had some reservations about playing a small-town boy, a con artist. He didn’t want to play that role,” Shaad said. It’s interesting to note that Hrithik has played a wide range of characters in his career, from romantic leads to action heroes, but it seems that he was not comfortable with the idea of portraying a small-town character.
The role of “Bunty” eventually went to Abhishek Bachchan, who delivered a critically acclaimed performance in the film. Abhishek’s portrayal of the character was praised for its energy, charm, and vulnerability, and he went on to become a household name in Bollywood.
It’s fascinating to think about how differently the film would have turned out if Hrithik had accepted the role. While it’s difficult to imagine anyone else playing “Bunty”, it’s interesting to consider how Hrithik’s chemistry with the other actors might have been different. Perhaps the film would have had a more brooding, intense tone, given Hrithik’s characteristic intensity on screen.
On the other hand, Abhishek’s performance as “Bunty” was a game-changer for his career, and it’s hard to imagine anyone else playing the role with the same level of charm and charisma. Abhishek’s chemistry with co-star Priyanka Chopra was undeniable, and the two actors brought a level of energy and excitement to the film that helped make it a massive hit.
In retrospect, it’s clear that Shaad Ali made the right decision in casting Abhishek as “Bunty”. Abhishek’s performance was a key factor in the film’s success, and it helped establish him as a leading man in Bollywood. While it’s interesting to think about what might have been if Hrithik had accepted the role, it’s hard to argue with the choice that Shaad Ali and the producers made.
As the film’s director, Shaad Ali has a unique perspective on the casting process, and his insights into Hrithik’s rejection of the role offer a fascinating glimpse into the machinations of the Bollywood industry. It’s a reminder that casting decisions are often complex and multifaceted, and that even the smallest factors can influence the final outcome.
In conclusion, Shaad Ali’s revelation about Hrithik’s rejection of the role in “Bunty Aur Babli” is a fascinating insight into the casting process and the decisions that go into making a film. While it’s interesting to think about what might have been if Hrithik had accepted the role, it’s clear that Abhishek Bachchan was the right choice for the part. The film remains a beloved classic of Bollywood, and Abhishek’s performance as “Bunty” is a key factor in its enduring success.
