Foolish to think censor board is still relevant: RGV on Jana Nayagan row
The recent controversy surrounding Vijay’s film ‘Jana Nayagan’ not getting a censor certificate from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has sparked a heated debate about the relevance of the censor board in today’s digital age. Renowned film director Ram Gopal Varma has weighed in on the issue, stating that it’s “foolish to think that the censor board is still relevant today.” Varma’s comments have ignited a fresh round of discussions about the role of the CBFC in the film industry and whether it’s time to rethink its purpose.
Varma’s statement comes at a time when the film industry is grappling with the challenges of censorship in the digital era. With the rise of streaming platforms and social media, the traditional models of censorship are being questioned. The CBFC, which was established in 1952, has been responsible for certifying films for public exhibition in India. However, with the changing times, many are questioning whether the censor board is still necessary.
According to Varma, the censor board was born in an era when the state controlled the media, and there was a need for regulation. However, with the advent of technology and the proliferation of social media, any form of control is impossible. “Censor board was born in an era when the state controlled the media, but today, any form of control is impossible,” he said. Varma’s comments highlight the challenges faced by the censor board in regulating content in the digital age.
Varma also blamed the film industry for allowing the CBFC to exist for so long. He argued that the industry has been complicit in perpetuating the censor board’s relevance, even when it’s no longer necessary. “It’s foolish to think that the censor board is still relevant today,” he said. Varma’s comments are a scathing critique of the film industry’s failure to adapt to changing times and its reliance on outdated models of censorship.
The controversy surrounding ‘Jana Nayagan’ has brought the issue of censorship to the forefront. The film, which stars Vijay, has been denied a censor certificate by the CBFC, citing objections to certain scenes and dialogue. The film’s producers have been forced to make changes to the film to secure a certificate, sparking a debate about artistic freedom and censorship.
Varma’s comments have been welcomed by many in the film industry, who see the censor board as an outdated institution. Many argue that the censor board’s role is no longer relevant in today’s digital age, where content is readily available on streaming platforms and social media. The censor board’s attempts to regulate content are seen as futile, and many believe that it’s time to rethink its purpose.
However, others have argued that the censor board still has a role to play in regulating content, particularly when it comes to protecting children and vulnerable audiences. They argue that the censor board provides a necessary check on explicit content and helps to maintain social norms.
Despite these arguments, Varma’s comments have highlighted the need for a rethink of the censor board’s role in the film industry. As the industry continues to evolve and adapt to changing times, it’s clear that the traditional models of censorship are no longer effective. The rise of streaming platforms and social media has created new challenges for the censor board, and it’s time for the industry to consider new approaches to regulating content.
In conclusion, Ram Gopal Varma’s comments on the censor board’s relevance have sparked a necessary debate about the role of censorship in the film industry. As the industry continues to evolve, it’s clear that traditional models of censorship are no longer effective. The controversy surrounding ‘Jana Nayagan’ has highlighted the need for a rethink of the censor board’s role, and it’s time for the industry to consider new approaches to regulating content. Whether or not the censor board is still relevant today is a matter of debate, but one thing is clear: the industry needs to adapt to changing times and find new ways to regulate content in the digital age.
About the Author
