Congrats on views: Dhurandhar actor Naveen on Dhruv Rathee review
The world of cinema is no stranger to controversy, and the latest film to spark a heated debate is Dhurandhar. The movie has been making waves, but not everyone is pleased with its content. YouTuber Dhruv Rathee recently took to his platform to express his disappointment with the film, calling it out for spreading “false propaganda” and labeling its director, Aditya Dhar, a “propagandist”. However, the cast of Dhurandhar is not taking the criticism lying down. In a recent interview, Naveen Kaushik, who plays the role of ‘Donga’ in the film, responded to Rathee’s scathing review.
Kaushik’s response was calm and collected, yet firm in its stance. When asked about Rathee’s criticism, he stated, “He’s an opinionated person. I’m associated with the film, I don’t agree with him. He got some views because of us, congratulations.” These words may seem simple, but they carry a lot of weight. Kaushik is essentially saying that while Rathee is entitled to his opinion, he doesn’t share the same views. Moreover, by congratulating Rathee on getting views due to the film, Kaushik is implying that the YouTuber’s criticism is, in fact, a testament to the film’s impact.
This exchange has sparked a larger conversation about the role of cinema in shaping public opinion and the responsibility that comes with it. Rathee’s criticism of Dhurandhar is not just about the film itself, but about the potential consequences of its message. He argues that the film spreads “false propaganda”, which can be detrimental to society. On the other hand, Kaushik’s response suggests that the film is meant to spark a conversation, rather than dictate a particular ideology.
The debate surrounding Dhurandhar is reminiscent of similar controversies that have plagued other films in the past. The line between artistic expression and social responsibility is often blurred, leaving audiences and critics alike to ponder the implications of a film’s message. In this case, the fact that Dhurandhar has sparked such a heated debate is a testament to its relevance and impact.
It’s also worth noting that Dhruv Rathee is not the only one to criticize Dhurandhar. Many others have taken to social media to express their disappointment with the film, citing similar concerns about its potential to spread misinformation. However, the cast and crew of the film remain steadfast in their defense of the movie. Aditya Dhar, the director, has been compared to other filmmakers like Vivek Agnihotri, who have also been accused of promoting a particular ideology through their work.
The comparison between Aditya Dhar and Vivek Agnihotri is interesting, as both directors have been known to push boundaries and challenge conventional norms through their films. While some critics accuse them of promoting a particular agenda, others see their work as a necessary commentary on the state of society. The fact that Dhurandhar has sparked such a intense debate is a testament to the fact that cinema still has the power to challenge and provoke us.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding Dhurandhar is a complex one, with multiple perspectives and opinions at play. While Dhruv Rathee’s criticism of the film is valid, Naveen Kaushik’s response is also worth considering. The fact that the film has sparked such a heated debate is a testament to its impact and relevance. As we continue to navigate the complex world of cinema and social responsibility, it’s essential to keep the conversation going and to consider multiple perspectives.
Ultimately, the success of a film like Dhurandhar lies not just in its box office numbers, but in its ability to spark a conversation and challenge our assumptions. As Naveen Kaushik so aptly put it, “He got some views because of us, congratulations.” The fact that Dhruv Rathee’s review has generated so much attention is a testament to the film’s impact, and we can only hope that this conversation will continue to evolve and grow in the days to come.
About the Author
