Congrats on views: Dhurandhar actor Naveen on Dhruv Rathee review
The world of cinema is no stranger to controversy, and the latest film to stir up a storm is Dhurandhar. The movie has been making headlines for its alleged propagation of false information, with many critics and viewers calling it out for its perceived biases. One such critic is popular YouTuber Dhruv Rathee, who recently released a scathing review of the film, slamming it for spreading “false propaganda” and labeling its director, Aditya Dhar, a “propagandist”.
However, not everyone is taking Rathee’s criticism lying down. Naveen Kaushik, the actor who played the role of Donga in the film, has responded to Rathee’s review, and his comments are sure to generate a lot of interest. In a recent interview, Kaushik said, “He’s an opinionated person. I’m associated with the film, I don’t agree with him. He got some views because of us, congratulations.” These words are a clear indication that the actor is not taking Rathee’s criticism seriously and is instead choosing to focus on the positive aspects of the film.
For those who may not be familiar with the controversy surrounding Dhurandhar, it’s essential to understand the context. The film has been accused of promoting a particular ideology and presenting a skewed version of reality. Rathee, in his review, pointed out several instances where the film allegedly distorts facts and presents a biased narrative. He also drew parallels between Aditya Dhar and another controversial filmmaker, Vivek Agnihotri, suggesting that both directors are guilty of propagating false information through their films.
While Rathee’s criticism has sparked a heated debate, it’s interesting to note that Naveen Kaushik’s response is not aggressive or confrontational. Instead, the actor seems to be taking the high road, choosing to focus on the film’s positives rather than engaging in a war of words with Rathee. By saying “congrats on views”, Kaushik is implying that Rathee’s review has benefited from the film’s popularity, and that the YouTuber’s criticism is, in fact, a testament to the film’s impact.
This exchange between Kaushik and Rathee raises important questions about the role of criticism in the world of cinema. While critics like Rathee have every right to express their opinions and point out flaws in a film, it’s also essential to recognize that not everyone will agree with their perspective. In this case, Kaushik’s response suggests that he values the film’s artistic merit and is proud of the work that the cast and crew have put in, regardless of the criticism it may have received.
The controversy surrounding Dhurandhar also highlights the challenges faced by filmmakers in today’s polarized world. With social media platforms amplifying every opinion and criticism, it’s becoming increasingly difficult for filmmakers to navigate the complex landscape of public perception. While some may argue that criticism is essential for artistic growth, others may feel that it can be detrimental to a film’s success.
Ultimately, the debate surrounding Dhurandhar is a reflection of the diverse perspectives and opinions that exist in our society. While some may agree with Rathee’s criticism, others may see the film as a work of art that deserves to be appreciated on its own merit. As Naveen Kaushik’s response suggests, the film’s cast and crew are proud of their work, and they believe that it has value regardless of the criticism it may have received.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding Dhurandhar is a complex issue that raises important questions about the role of criticism in cinema. While Dhruv Rathee’s review has sparked a heated debate, Naveen Kaushik’s response is a reminder that not everyone will agree with every opinion. As we navigate the complex world of cinema, it’s essential to recognize the value of diverse perspectives and to approach each film with an open mind.
About the Author
