Congrats on views: Dhurandhar actor Naveen on Dhruv Rathee review
The world of Indian cinema is no stranger to controversy, and the latest film to be embroiled in a heated debate is Dhurandhar. The movie, which has been making waves with its thought-provoking storyline, has drawn the ire of popular YouTuber Dhruv Rathee. In a recent video, Rathee slammed the film, accusing it of spreading “false propaganda” and labeling its director, Aditya Dhar, a “propagandist”. However, the film’s cast is not taking the criticism lying down, with actor Naveen Kaushik, who plays the role of ‘Donga’ in the movie, responding to Rathee’s scathing review.
In an interview, Kaushik expressed his disagreement with Rathee’s views, stating, “He’s an opinionated person. I’m associated with the film, I don’t agree with him. He got some views because of us, congratulations.” The actor’s response is a clear indication that the film’s team is not intimidated by the criticism and is, in fact, taking it in stride. By congratulating Rathee on the views he received, Kaushik is implying that the YouTuber’s video was only able to garner attention because of the film’s popularity.
Rathee’s video, which has been making the rounds on social media, is a scathing critique of Dhurandhar. The YouTuber accuses the film of promoting a biased and misleading narrative, one that is detrimental to the country’s social fabric. He also draws parallels between Aditya Dhar and another controversial filmmaker, Vivek Agnihotri, implying that both directors are guilty of peddling propaganda through their movies.
However, Kaushik’s response suggests that the film’s team is not buying into Rathee’s criticism. By dismissing the YouTuber’s views as mere opinion, Kaushik is implying that Rathee’s review is not an objective assessment of the film’s merits. Instead, he seems to be suggesting that Rathee’s video is a desperate attempt to garner attention and views by piggybacking on the film’s popularity.
The debate surrounding Dhurandhar is a timely reminder of the complexities of artistic expression in India. With the country’s cinema landscape becoming increasingly polarized, filmmakers are facing intense scrutiny for their work. While some films are being hailed as brave and thought-provoking, others are being criticized for promoting divisive ideologies.
In this context, the response of Dhurandhar’s cast and crew to Rathee’s criticism is significant. By standing by their film and dismissing the criticism as mere opinion, they are asserting their right to creative freedom. They are also highlighting the importance of respecting differing viewpoints, even if they are not aligned with one’s own beliefs.
As the debate surrounding Dhurandhar continues to rage on, it will be interesting to see how the film’s team responds to the criticism. Will they engage with their detractors, or will they choose to ignore the noise and focus on promoting their film? One thing is certain, however – the controversy surrounding Dhurandhar has only served to increase its visibility, with the film becoming a talking point in cinematic circles.
In conclusion, the spat between Dhruv Rathee and the team of Dhurandhar is a testament to the power of cinema to spark important conversations. While the film’s cast and crew may not agree with Rathee’s views, they are acknowledging the importance of his opinion. By responding to the criticism in a measured and respectful manner, they are showing that they value the feedback, even if they do not agree with it.
As the Indian film industry continues to evolve, it is essential to promote a culture of respectful dialogue and debate. By engaging with criticism and acknowledging differing viewpoints, filmmakers can create a more inclusive and vibrant cinematic landscape. And as for Dhurandhar, it remains to be seen how the film will perform at the box office, but one thing is certain – it has already sparked a conversation that will be remembered for a long time to come.
About the Author
