Complaint filed against Ranveer for mimicking Kantara scene, calling Goddess ‘female ghost’
The world of cinema has always been a sensitive topic, especially when it comes to depicting religious sentiments. Recently, a police complaint was filed against actor Ranveer Singh in Bengaluru for allegedly hurting religious sentiments by mimicking a scene from Rishab Shetty’s ‘Kantara: Chapter 1’. The complaint was filed by Bengaluru-based advocate Prashanth, who claimed that Ranveer’s actions had hurt the sentiments of “millions of Hindus, particularly the Tulu-speaking community of Karnataka”.
The controversy began when Ranveer Singh allegedly mimicked a scene from the movie ‘Kantara: Chapter 1’, where he referred to Goddess Chamundi Daiva as a ‘female ghost’. This statement did not sit well with the Hindu community, particularly the Tulu-speaking population of Karnataka, who consider Goddess Chamundi Daiva to be a revered deity. The complainant, Prashanth, stated that Ranveer’s statement was not only hurtful but also an insult to the community’s faith and traditions.
The movie ‘Kantara: Chapter 1’ has been a massive hit in Karnataka, and its depiction of the Tulu culture and traditions has been widely appreciated. However, Ranveer’s alleged mimicking of the scene and his reference to Goddess Chamundi Daiva as a ‘female ghost’ has sparked outrage among the community. The complainant has alleged that Ranveer’s actions were intentional and aimed at hurting the religious sentiments of the community.
The complaint filed against Ranveer Singh has brought to light the sensitive issue of depicting religious sentiments in cinema. While freedom of expression is a fundamental right, it is also important to ensure that this freedom is not misused to hurt the sentiments of any community. The Indian Penal Code (IPC) has provisions to deal with such cases, including Section 295A, which states that “whoever, with deliberate and malicious intention, outrages the religious feelings of any class of citizens of India, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both”.
In recent years, there have been several instances of celebrities and public figures facing backlash for their comments or actions that have been deemed hurtful to certain communities. The rise of social media has made it easier for people to express their opinions and mobilize support for their causes. However, it has also created a culture of outrage, where people are quick to take offense and demand action against those who they perceive as having hurt their sentiments.
The case against Ranveer Singh is a classic example of this phenomenon. While the actor’s intention may not have been to hurt the sentiments of the Hindu community, his actions have been perceived as insensitive and hurtful. The complaint filed against him is a reflection of the community’s outrage and their demand for accountability.
As the case against Ranveer Singh unfolds, it will be interesting to see how the law enforcement agencies and the courts deal with the issue. The complaint has brought to light the complex issue of balancing freedom of expression with the need to protect religious sentiments. While it is important to ensure that people have the freedom to express themselves, it is also important to ensure that this freedom is not misused to hurt the sentiments of others.
In conclusion, the complaint filed against Ranveer Singh for mimicking a scene from ‘Kantara: Chapter 1’ and calling Goddess Chamundi Daiva a ‘female ghost’ is a sensitive issue that requires careful consideration. The case highlights the need for celebrities and public figures to be mindful of their actions and words, and to ensure that they do not hurt the sentiments of any community. As the law enforcement agencies and the courts deal with the issue, it will be important to balance the need to protect religious sentiments with the need to ensure freedom of expression.
About the Author
