CBFC Cuts Words Like ‘Pradhan Mantri’ & ‘Chaiwala’ from Murderbaad
The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has once again sparked a controversy by editing out certain words from a Bollywood film. This time, it’s the upcoming movie ‘Murderbaad’ that has fallen prey to the censor board’s scissors. According to reports, the CBFC instructed the makers of the film to edit out words such as ‘pradhan mantri’ (prime minister) and ‘chaiwala’ (tea vendor) from a dialogue. The director of the film, Arnab Chatterjee, has expressed his disappointment and frustration over the decision.
‘Murderbaad’ is a crime thriller that tells the story of a group of friends who get entangled in a murder mystery. The film has received an ‘A’ certification, which means that it is suitable only for adults. The CBFC’s decision to censor certain words from the film has sparked a debate about the board’s role in deciding what content is suitable for Indian audiences.
In a statement, Arnab Chatterjee said, “It was absolutely benign joke, rather aspirational for lower-middle class of our country, and far away from any political stance.” He further added, “We believe that the words ‘pradhan mantri’ and ‘chaiwala’ are not offensive and do not promote any negative sentiment. We are disappointed with the CBFC’s decision to censor these words, as it goes against the spirit of creative freedom.”
The CBFC’s decision to censor words like ‘pradhan mantri’ and ‘chaiwala’ has raised questions about the board’s sensitivity to Indian culture and society. These words are commonly used in everyday conversations in India and are not considered offensive. The CBFC’s decision to censor them has been seen as an overreach by many film enthusiasts and critics.
The CBFC’s role in censoring films is a contentious issue in India. While the board is responsible for ensuring that films do not promote violence, obscenity, or anti-national activities, many argue that it often goes overboard in cutting out content that is not harmful to society. The board’s decisions are often seen as arbitrary and biased, and have been criticized for stifling creative freedom.
In recent years, the CBFC has been in the news for its controversial decisions. From chopping off kisses between actors to cutting out scenes that show farmers protesting against the government, the board has been accused of being overly cautious and sensitive. The CBFC’s decision to censor words like ‘pradhan mantri’ and ‘chaiwala’ from ‘Murderbaad’ is just the latest example of its overreach.
The film industry has also been vocal about the CBFC’s decisions. Many filmmakers have spoken out against the board’s censorship, arguing that it goes against the spirit of creative freedom. The Indian Film Industry (IFFI) has also expressed its concerns about the CBFC’s decisions, stating that they are often arbitrary and biased.
The CBFC’s decision to censor words like ‘pradhan mantri’ and ‘chaiwala’ from ‘Murderbaad’ has sparked a debate about the board’s role in Indian society. While the board is responsible for ensuring that films do not promote harmful content, many argue that it often goes overboard in cutting out content that is not offensive. The board’s decisions are often seen as arbitrary and biased, and have been criticized for stifling creative freedom.
In conclusion, the CBFC’s decision to censor words like ‘pradhan mantri’ and ‘chaiwala’ from ‘Murderbaad’ is just the latest example of its overreach. The board’s role in Indian society is contentious, and its decisions are often seen as arbitrary and biased. The film industry has expressed its concerns about the board’s censorship, and many argue that it goes against the spirit of creative freedom.
Source:
