CBFC Cuts Words Like ‘Pradhan Mantri’ & ‘Chaiwala’ from Murderbaad
In a recent move that has left many in the film industry perplexed, the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has instructed the makers of the upcoming film ‘Murderbaad’ to edit out words such as ‘pradhan mantri’ and ‘chaiwala’ from a dialogue. The film, directed by Arnab Chatterjee, has received an ‘A’ certification, but not before the CBFC deemed these words as controversial and required them to be removed.
The words in question are part of a dialogue in the film where a character is making a joke about aspirations. The director has claimed that the intention behind the dialogue was to poke fun at the struggles of the lower-middle class in India, and not to take a political stance. However, the CBFC seems to have disagreed, and the words have been chopped out of the film.
The decision has left many in the film industry scratching their heads. The use of words like ‘pradhan mantri’ and ‘chaiwala’ is a common occurrence in everyday conversation in India, and it is hard to understand why the CBFC deemed them as controversial. The words are not even remotely related to any political party or ideology, and are simply a part of the country’s cultural fabric.
The CBFC has been under fire in recent times for its arbitrary and often draconian decisions. From chopping out scenes from films to objecting to the use of certain words, the board has been accused of stifling creativity and freedom of expression. The latest decision is just the latest example of this trend.
The film industry has long been a reflection of Indian society, and has often tackled sensitive topics in its films. However, the CBFC seems to be more interested in censoring films than in promoting creative expression. The use of words like ‘pradhan mantri’ and ‘chaiwala’ is a part of the country’s cultural identity, and it is absurd that the CBFC has deemed them as controversial.
The decision has also raised questions about the CBFC’s understanding of the country’s cultural context. The words in question are not even remotely related to any political party or ideology, and are simply a part of everyday conversation in India. It is hard to understand why the CBFC has deemed them as controversial, and what kind of impact this decision will have on the film.
The film industry has long been a reflection of Indian society, and has often tackled sensitive topics in its films. However, the CBFC seems to be more interested in censoring films than in promoting creative expression. The use of words like ‘pradhan mantri’ and ‘chaiwala’ is a part of the country’s cultural identity, and it is absurd that the CBFC has deemed them as controversial.
The decision has also sparked a debate about the role of the CBFC in the film industry. The board was established to ensure that films are suitable for all audiences, but it has long been accused of overstepping its bounds and stifling creativity. The latest decision is just the latest example of this trend.
The film industry has long been a reflection of Indian society, and has often tackled sensitive topics in its films. However, the CBFC seems to be more interested in censoring films than in promoting creative expression. The use of words like ‘pradhan mantri’ and ‘chaiwala’ is a part of the country’s cultural identity, and it is absurd that the CBFC has deemed them as controversial.
In conclusion, the decision by the CBFC to cut out words like ‘pradhan mantri’ and ‘chaiwala’ from the film ‘Murderbaad’ is a classic example of the board’s arbitrary and often draconian decisions. The use of these words is a part of the country’s cultural identity, and it is absurd that the CBFC has deemed them as controversial. The decision has sparked a debate about the role of the CBFC in the film industry, and it is high time that the board is reformed to promote creative expression rather than stifling it.
