Can’t deny 26/11: ‘Dhurandhar’ actor Danish on Hrithik’s review
The world of Bollywood is no stranger to controversy, and the latest film to stir up a storm is ‘Dhurandhar’. The movie has been making headlines for its portrayal of politics, and one of the actors, Danish Pandor, has responded to Hrithik Roshan’s review of the film. In a recent statement, Danish, who plays the role of Uzair Baloch in the film, addressed Hrithik’s comments on the movie’s politics.
For those who may not be aware, Hrithik Roshan had expressed his disagreement with the film’s politics, sparking a debate about the movie’s portrayal of sensitive topics. However, Danish Pandor has come to the defense of the film, stating that the political aspects of the movie are research-backed and cannot be denied. Specifically, he mentioned the 26/11 attack, which is a pivotal event in the film, saying, “Even if you take into consideration the 26/11 attack, you can’t deny that it happened.”
The 26/11 attack, which took place in 2008, was a devastating terrorist attack that shook the city of Mumbai. The attack, which was carried out by a group of terrorists from Pakistan, resulted in the loss of hundreds of lives and left many more injured. The event is still widely remembered and commemorated today, and its impact on Indian politics and society cannot be overstated.
Danish Pandor’s statement highlights the importance of acknowledging the reality of such events, even if they are uncomfortable or controversial. By including the 26/11 attack in the film, the makers of ‘Dhurandhar’ are attempting to shed light on the complexities of politics and terrorism in India. While some may disagree with the film’s portrayal of these issues, Danish Pandor’s statement emphasizes that the events depicted in the movie are based on real events and cannot be denied.
The debate surrounding ‘Dhurandhar’ is a testament to the power of cinema to spark important conversations and challenge our perspectives. As an art form, films have the ability to tackle sensitive topics and bring attention to issues that may be overlooked or ignored. However, this also means that films can be subject to criticism and controversy, as different people may have different opinions on how these topics should be portrayed.
In the case of ‘Dhurandhar’, the film’s portrayal of politics and terrorism has sparked a lively debate, with some praising the film’s bold approach and others criticizing its handling of sensitive topics. Hrithik Roshan’s review, which expressed disagreement with the film’s politics, is just one example of the diverse range of opinions on the movie.
However, Danish Pandor’s response to Hrithik’s review highlights the importance of considering the context and research that goes into making a film. By emphasizing that the political aspects of the movie are research-backed, Danish Pandor is reminding us that the events depicted in the film are based on real events and should not be taken lightly.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding ‘Dhurandhar’ is a reminder of the power of cinema to spark important conversations and challenge our perspectives. While opinions may vary on the film’s portrayal of politics and terrorism, Danish Pandor’s statement emphasizes the importance of acknowledging the reality of events like the 26/11 attack. As we continue to discuss and debate the issues raised by the film, it is essential to consider the context and research that goes into making a movie.
Ultimately, the debate surrounding ‘Dhurandhar’ is a testament to the film’s ability to challenge our perspectives and spark important conversations. As we reflect on the movie’s portrayal of politics and terrorism, we must also acknowledge the reality of events like the 26/11 attack and the impact they have had on our society.
About the Author
