Can’t deny 26/11: ‘Dhurandhar’ actor Danish on Hrithik’s review
The world of Bollywood is no stranger to controversy, and the latest film to spark debate is ‘Dhurandhar’. The movie has been making headlines for its portrayal of politics, with some critics praising its bold approach and others criticizing its perceived biases. One of the most high-profile critics of the film’s politics is none other than Hrithik Roshan, who recently expressed his disagreement with the film’s take on sensitive issues.
However, not everyone is willing to let Hrithik’s opinion go unchallenged. Danish Pandor, the talented actor who plays the role of Uzair Baloch in ‘Dhurandhar’, has spoken out in response to Hrithik’s comments. In a recent interview, Danish stated, “This is very subjective…As far as the political aspect goes, these are all research-backed elements. Even if you take into consideration the 26/11 attack, you can’t deny that it happened.”
For those who may be unfamiliar, the 26/11 attack refers to the devastating terrorist attack that took place in Mumbai on November 26, 2008. The attack, which was carried out by a group of terrorists from Pakistan, resulted in the loss of over 160 lives and left hundreds more injured. It was a traumatic event that shocked the nation and had far-reaching consequences for India’s relations with its neighboring country.
Danish’s comment is significant because it highlights the fact that the film’s portrayal of politics is not just a matter of opinion, but is also rooted in historical fact. The 26/11 attack is a well-documented event that has been extensively reported on and investigated by authorities. To deny that it happened or to downplay its significance would be to ignore the reality of the situation.
By citing the 26/11 attack as an example, Danish is also drawing attention to the fact that the film’s politics are not just about ideology or opinion, but also about acknowledging the harsh realities of the world we live in. The film’s portrayal of terrorism, extremism, and violence is not just a product of the writers’ imagination, but is also based on real-world events and issues.
It’s also worth noting that Hrithik’s disagreement with the film’s politics is not necessarily a critique of the film’s factual accuracy, but rather a disagreement with the film’s perspective or interpretation of events. While it’s perfectly valid to have differing opinions on politics and ideology, it’s also important to recognize that facts are facts, and that certain events and issues cannot be denied or ignored.
In recent years, Bollywood has come under increasing scrutiny for its portrayal of politics and sensitive issues. Some films have been accused of promoting a particular ideology or agenda, while others have been praised for their bold and nuanced approach to complex issues. ‘Dhurandhar’ is just the latest example of a film that is sparking debate and discussion about the role of politics in cinema.
As the debate surrounding ‘Dhurandhar’ continues to unfold, it will be interesting to see how the film’s cast and crew respond to criticism and feedback. Will they choose to engage with their critics and defend their vision, or will they opt to stay silent and let the film speak for itself? One thing is certain, however: the discussion surrounding ‘Dhurandhar’ is just the latest example of the important and ongoing conversation about the role of politics in Bollywood.
In conclusion, Danish Pandor’s response to Hrithik Roshan’s comments is a timely reminder that facts are facts, and that certain events and issues cannot be denied or ignored. While opinions may vary on the film’s politics and ideology, it’s essential to recognize that the film’s portrayal of sensitive issues is rooted in research and historical fact. As the debate surrounding ‘Dhurandhar’ continues to unfold, we can expect to see more discussion and analysis of the film’s politics and themes.
About the Author
