Kannada language excluded from railway exam in B’luru, sparks row
The city of Bengaluru, the capital of Karnataka, has been at the center of a controversy surrounding the exclusion of the Kannada language from a railway exam conducted by the South Western Railway. The exam, which was held recently, allowed only Hindi and English as the medium of instruction, sparking sharp protests from pro-Kannada groups. The move has been widely criticized, with many calling it a systemic bias designed to favor Hindi-speaking candidates over local ones.
The issue has triggered a heated debate, with many questioning the logic behind excluding Kannada, the official language of Karnataka, from the exam. Pro-Kannada groups have argued that the decision is a clear attempt to undermine the importance of the local language and culture. They have also pointed out that the move is against the principles of linguistic diversity and inclusivity, which are enshrined in the Indian Constitution.
BJP leader CT Ravi has weighed in on the issue, calling it a “technical injustice.” He has argued that the exclusion of Kannada from the exam is a clear example of the systemic bias that exists in the country, where Hindi is often given preference over other languages. Ravi has also pointed out that the move is against the interests of the local population, who are predominantly Kannada-speaking.
The controversy has also sparked a wider debate about the role of language in public exams and the need for greater inclusivity. Many have argued that exams should be conducted in the local language, to ensure that candidates from the region are not disadvantaged. Others have pointed out that the use of Hindi and English as the sole medium of instruction is a relic of the colonial era, and that it is time to move towards a more inclusive approach.
The South Western Railway has defended its decision, citing technical reasons for the exclusion of Kannada from the exam. However, the explanation has failed to convince the pro-Kannada groups, who have vowed to continue their protests until the decision is reversed. The issue has also sparked a wider debate about the need for greater linguistic diversity in public exams, and the importance of promoting local languages and cultures.
The exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam is not an isolated incident. There have been several instances in the past, where the language has been excluded from public exams, sparking widespread protests. The issue has also been raised in the Karnataka state assembly, with many MLAs calling for greater protection for the language.
The controversy has also highlighted the need for greater sensitivity towards linguistic diversity in the country. India is a multilingual country, with 22 officially recognized languages, and it is essential to promote and protect all of them. The exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam is a clear example of the systemic bias that exists in the country, and it is time to address this issue.
In conclusion, the exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam in Bengaluru has sparked a row, with many calling it a systemic bias designed to favor Hindi-speaking candidates over local ones. The move has been widely criticized, and it is essential to address this issue to promote greater linguistic diversity and inclusivity. As BJP leader CT Ravi has pointed out, the exclusion of Kannada from the exam is a “technical injustice,” and it is time to rectify this situation.
The issue has also sparked a wider debate about the need for greater inclusivity in public exams, and the importance of promoting local languages and cultures. It is essential to ensure that exams are conducted in a way that is fair and inclusive, and that candidates from all linguistic backgrounds are given an equal opportunity to succeed.
As the controversy continues to unfold, it is essential to keep in mind the importance of linguistic diversity and inclusivity. The exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam is a clear example of the systemic bias that exists in the country, and it is time to address this issue. We must work towards promoting greater linguistic diversity and inclusivity, and ensure that all languages are given equal importance.
About the Author
