Kannada language excluded from railway exam in B’luru, sparks row
The recent decision by the South Western Railway to conduct an exam in Bengaluru with only Hindi and English as the medium of instruction has sparked a major controversy in the state of Karnataka. The exclusion of Kannada language from the exam has triggered sharp protests from pro-Kannada groups, who claim that this decision reflects a systemic bias designed to favor Hindi-speaking candidates over local ones. The issue has gained significant attention, with many questioning the rationale behind the decision and its potential implications for the local population.
The exam in question was conducted by the South Western Railway in Bengaluru, which is the capital city of Karnataka. It is worth noting that Kannada is the official language of the state, and it is spoken by the majority of the population. However, despite this, the railway authorities chose to conduct the exam only in Hindi and English, leaving out Kannada altogether. This move has been seen as a deliberate attempt to sideline the local language and favor candidates who are more proficient in Hindi.
Pro-Kannada groups have been quick to condemn the decision, stating that it is a clear example of the systemic bias that exists in the country. They argue that the exclusion of Kannada from the exam is a deliberate attempt to disadvantage local candidates and favor those from other parts of the country who are more proficient in Hindi. This, they claim, is a violation of the rights of the local population and goes against the principles of linguistic equality.
BJP leader CT Ravi has also weighed in on the issue, calling it a “technical injustice.” He has stated that the decision to exclude Kannada from the exam is unacceptable and that the railway authorities should have included the local language as a medium of instruction. Ravi’s comments reflect the widespread outrage and disappointment that has been expressed by the people of Karnataka over this issue.
The controversy surrounding the railway exam has also raised questions about the status of Kannada in the state. Despite being the official language, Kannada is often marginalized in favor of other languages, particularly Hindi and English. This has led to concerns about the erosion of the local culture and the rights of the local population. The exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam is seen as a symptom of this larger problem, where the local language is consistently ignored and undervalued.
The issue has also sparked a debate about the role of language in public examinations. Many argue that exams should be conducted in the local language, as this would provide a level playing field for all candidates. Others claim that conducting exams only in Hindi and English is a way of promoting national integration and facilitating communication across different regions. However, this argument is not convincing to the people of Karnataka, who feel that their language and culture are being ignored and disrespected.
In response to the protests, the railway authorities have defended their decision, stating that the exam was conducted in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Indian Railways. They claim that the decision to exclude Kannada was not taken with any malicious intent and that the exam was open to all candidates, regardless of their language proficiency. However, this explanation has not satisfied the pro-Kannada groups, who continue to demand that the exam be reconducted with Kannada as a medium of instruction.
The controversy surrounding the railway exam has significant implications for the state of Karnataka and its people. It highlights the ongoing struggle for linguistic equality and the need to promote and protect the local language. The issue also raises questions about the role of language in public examinations and the need to ensure that all candidates have a fair and equal opportunity to participate.
In conclusion, the exclusion of Kannada language from the railway exam in Bengaluru has sparked a major controversy in the state of Karnataka. The decision has been widely condemned as a systemic bias designed to favor Hindi-speaking candidates over local ones. The issue has raised questions about the status of Kannada in the state and the need to promote and protect the local language. It is essential that the railway authorities take immediate action to address the concerns of the pro-Kannada groups and ensure that the rights of the local population are respected and protected.
About the Author
