Kannada language excluded from railway exam in B’luru, sparks row
The city of Bengaluru, known for its rich cultural heritage and vibrant linguistic diversity, has been at the center of a controversy that has sparked sharp protests from pro-Kannada groups. The South Western Railway recently conducted an exam in Bengaluru, but with a significant twist – the Kannada language was excluded as a medium, with only Hindi and English being allowed. This move has triggered a heated debate, with many arguing that the decision reflects a systemic bias designed to favor Hindi-speaking people over local candidates.
The exam in question was conducted by the South Western Railway, a zone of the Indian Railways that covers the states of Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, and parts of Tamil Nadu. However, the decision to exclude Kannada as a medium has raised eyebrows, with many questioning the logic behind such a move. After all, Bengaluru is the capital city of Karnataka, a state where Kannada is the official language. It is surprising, to say the least, that the local language was not given due consideration in the exam.
Pro-Kannada groups have been quick to condemn the move, arguing that it is a clear case of linguistic bias. They point out that the exclusion of Kannada as a medium will put local candidates at a disadvantage, as they will be forced to take the exam in a language that is not their mother tongue. This, they argue, will lead to a situation where Hindi-speaking candidates will have an unfair advantage over their local counterparts.
The issue has also drawn the attention of local politicians, with BJP leader CT Ravi weighing in on the controversy. Ravi has called the issue a “technical injustice,” arguing that the decision to exclude Kannada as a medium is a clear case of bias against the local population. He has demanded that the South Western Railway take immediate action to rectify the situation and include Kannada as a medium in future exams.
The controversy has also sparked a wider debate about the role of language in public examinations. Many argue that language should not be a barrier to opportunity, and that candidates should be given the option to take exams in their local language. This, they argue, will help to level the playing field and ensure that all candidates have an equal chance of success.
The issue is not just limited to the railway exam, but has wider implications for the linguistic diversity of the country. India is a multilingual country, with 22 official languages recognized by the Constitution. However, despite this recognition, there is a growing perception that Hindi is being imposed as a dominant language, to the detriment of other languages.
The controversy has also highlighted the need for greater sensitivity towards linguistic diversity in public examinations. Exams should be designed to be inclusive, with candidates given the option to take the exam in their local language. This will help to promote linguistic diversity and ensure that all candidates have an equal chance of success.
In conclusion, the exclusion of Kannada as a medium from the railway exam in Bengaluru has sparked a row that has far-reaching implications. The decision has been widely condemned as a case of linguistic bias, with many arguing that it reflects a systemic bias designed to favor Hindi-speaking people over local candidates. The issue has sparked a wider debate about the role of language in public examinations, and the need for greater sensitivity towards linguistic diversity.
As the controversy continues to simmer, it remains to be seen how the South Western Railway will respond to the criticism. Will they take steps to include Kannada as a medium in future exams, or will they stick to their decision to exclude the local language? Only time will tell, but one thing is certain – the issue has highlighted the need for greater sensitivity towards linguistic diversity in public examinations.
About the Author
