Prez rejects WB govt’s Bill to make CM chancellor of universities
In a significant development, President Droupadi Murmu has rejected the West Bengal University Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2022, which aimed to replace the Governor with the Chief Minister as the Chancellor of all state-run universities. This move has far-reaching implications for the education system in West Bengal and has sparked a debate about the role of politics in academia.
The West Bengal University Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2022, was passed by the West Bengal Legislative Assembly with the intention of making the Chief Minister the Chancellor of all state-run universities. The bill was then reserved by Governor Dr CV Ananda Bose for the President’s consideration in April 2024. The Governor’s decision to reserve the bill for the President’s consideration was seen as a move to seek the Centre’s opinion on the matter, given the potential implications of the bill on the autonomy of universities.
The rejection of the bill by the President is a significant setback for the West Bengal government, which had argued that the Chief Minister was better equipped to oversee the state’s education system. However, critics, including the BJP, had raised concerns that the bill would lead to increased political interference in the education system. They argued that making the Chief Minister the Chancellor would give the ruling party undue influence over the appointment of vice-chancellors, faculty members, and other key positions in universities.
The BJP and other critics had also pointed out that the bill would undermine the autonomy of universities, which is essential for academic freedom and excellence. They argued that the Governor, as the Chancellor, played a neutral and apolitical role, which was essential for maintaining the integrity of the education system. By replacing the Governor with the Chief Minister, the bill would have created a situation where the ruling party would have had significant control over the education system, which could lead to favoritism and nepotism.
The rejection of the bill is also seen as a victory for the academic community, which had expressed concerns about the potential consequences of the bill. Many academics and educationists had argued that the bill would lead to a decline in academic standards and would undermine the reputation of West Bengal’s universities. They had also pointed out that the bill would create a situation where the education system would be subject to political whims, which would be detrimental to the interests of students and the academic community.
The West Bengal government had argued that the bill was necessary to improve the state’s education system, which had been plagued by controversies and scandals in recent years. However, critics had pointed out that the bill was not a solution to the problems facing the education system and that it would only serve to increase political interference. They had argued that the government should focus on addressing the root causes of the problems, such as corruption, lack of infrastructure, and inadequate funding, rather than trying to exert control over the education system.
The rejection of the bill is also significant because it highlights the importance of the Governor’s role in the state’s education system. The Governor, as the Chancellor, plays a crucial role in maintaining the autonomy of universities and ensuring that the education system is free from political interference. The Governor’s decision to reserve the bill for the President’s consideration was a move to protect the interests of the academic community and to ensure that the education system is not subject to political whims.
In conclusion, the President’s rejection of the West Bengal University Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2022, is a significant development that has far-reaching implications for the education system in West Bengal. The bill, which aimed to replace the Governor with the Chief Minister as the Chancellor of all state-run universities, had raised concerns about political interference in the education system. The rejection of the bill is a victory for the academic community and highlights the importance of maintaining the autonomy of universities. It also underscores the need for the government to focus on addressing the root causes of the problems facing the education system, rather than trying to exert control over it.
The rejection of the bill is also a reminder that the education system should be free from political interference and that the autonomy of universities is essential for academic freedom and excellence. It is hoped that the West Bengal government will take the rejection of the bill as an opportunity to reflect on its priorities and to focus on improving the state’s education system in a way that benefits all stakeholders.
News Source: https://x.com/airnewsalerts/status/2000530778275618943
About the Author
