Prez rejects WB govt’s Bill to make CM chancellor of universities
In a significant development, President Droupadi Murmu has rejected the West Bengal University Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2022, which aimed to replace the Governor with the Chief Minister as the Chancellor of all state-run universities. This move has sparked a heated debate about the potential implications of such a change on the education system in the state. The Bill, which was reserved by Governor Dr CV Ananda Bose for the President’s consideration in April 2024, had been a subject of controversy, with critics raising concerns about the potential for political interference in the education system.
The West Bengal University Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2022, was introduced by the state government with the objective of making the Chief Minister the Chancellor of all state-run universities. The Bill proposed to amend the existing laws governing state-run universities, which currently designate the Governor as the Chancellor. The state government had argued that the change was necessary to ensure better coordination and management of the universities, and to enable the Chief Minister to play a more active role in the development of higher education in the state.
However, the Bill had faced opposition from various quarters, including the BJP and other critics, who had raised concerns about the potential for political interference in the education system. They had argued that making the Chief Minister the Chancellor of universities could lead to a situation where the education system is subject to political influence, and where academic decisions are taken based on political considerations rather than academic merit.
The Governor, Dr CV Ananda Bose, had reserved the Bill for the President’s consideration in April 2024, citing concerns about the potential implications of the change. The Governor had noted that the Bill had the potential to undermine the autonomy of universities and to compromise the academic freedom of teachers and students.
The President’s rejection of the Bill is a significant development, as it underscores the importance of maintaining the autonomy of universities and protecting the education system from political interference. The move is likely to be seen as a setback for the state government, which had been keen to push through the change.
The BJP and other critics have welcomed the President’s decision, saying that it is a victory for the autonomy of universities and the principles of academic freedom. They have argued that the decision will help to ensure that the education system in the state is protected from political interference, and that academic decisions are taken based on merit rather than political considerations.
The state government, on the other hand, has expressed disappointment at the President’s decision, saying that it will hinder the development of higher education in the state. The government has argued that the change was necessary to ensure better coordination and management of universities, and to enable the Chief Minister to play a more active role in the development of higher education.
The controversy surrounding the West Bengal University Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2022, highlights the ongoing debate about the role of politics in education. While some argue that politics has no place in education, others see it as a necessary evil, arguing that politicians have a role to play in shaping the education system and ensuring that it serves the needs of society.
However, the experience of other states, where similar changes have been made, suggests that making the Chief Minister the Chancellor of universities can have negative consequences. In some cases, it has led to a situation where academic decisions are taken based on political considerations, rather than academic merit. It has also led to a decline in the autonomy of universities, and a erosion of academic freedom.
In conclusion, the President’s rejection of the West Bengal University Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2022, is a significant development that underscores the importance of maintaining the autonomy of universities and protecting the education system from political interference. The move is likely to be seen as a victory for the principles of academic freedom, and a setback for those who seek to politicize the education system.
As the debate about the role of politics in education continues, it is essential to ensure that the education system is protected from political interference, and that academic decisions are taken based on merit rather than political considerations. This requires a nuanced and balanced approach, one that takes into account the need for political oversight and accountability, while also protecting the autonomy of universities and the principles of academic freedom.
News Source: https://x.com/airnewsalerts/status/2000530778275618943
About the Author
