HC Rejects TN Govt’s Plea Against Lighting Holy ‘Deep’ Near Dargah
In a significant development, the Madras High Court on Thursday dismissed the Tamil Nadu government’s appeal against the court’s order directing to light a holy ‘deep’ near a dargah. The court’s decision comes after the state government had filed an appeal against the earlier order, which had directed the authorities to allow the lighting of a holy ‘deep’ near the dargah located at the foot of the Thiruparankundram hill in Tamil Nadu.
The controversy surrounding the lighting of the holy ‘deep’ near the dargah has been ongoing for some time now. The court had earlier directed the authorities to allow the devotees to light the holy ‘deep’ near the dargah, but the state government had opposed the move, citing concerns about law and order. However, the court has now rejected the government’s appeal, saying that it was filed with an “ulterior motive”.
The court’s order is a significant victory for the devotees who had been seeking permission to light the holy ‘deep’ near the dargah. The devotees had argued that lighting the ‘deep’ was an essential part of their religious practice and that they should be allowed to do so near the dargah. The court had earlier accepted their argument and had directed the authorities to allow the lighting of the ‘deep’.
However, the state government had opposed the move, citing concerns about law and order. The government had argued that allowing the devotees to light the ‘deep’ near the dargah could lead to communal tensions and law and order problems. But the court has now rejected the government’s appeal, saying that the appeal was filed with an “ulterior motive”.
It is worth noting that the diya was not lit at the place after the court’s direction and was instead lit at another spot. This move was seen as an attempt by the authorities to circumvent the court’s order and to prevent the devotees from lighting the ‘deep’ near the dargah.
The court’s decision to reject the government’s appeal is a significant development in the case. The court has made it clear that the devotees have the right to practice their religion and that the authorities cannot prevent them from doing so without a valid reason. The court’s decision is also a blow to the state government, which had been opposing the move to allow the devotees to light the ‘deep’ near the dargah.
The case highlights the ongoing tensions between different religious communities in India. The country is a diverse and plural society, with many different religions and communities living together. However, there are often tensions and conflicts between these communities, particularly when it comes to issues related to religion and faith.
In recent years, there have been several instances of communal tensions and violence in India, particularly in relation to issues such as cow protection, love jihad, and the construction of religious buildings. These tensions often reflect deeper social and economic divisions within Indian society, and they can have serious consequences for individuals and communities.
In this context, the court’s decision to allow the devotees to light the ‘deep’ near the dargah is a significant development. The decision reflects the importance of protecting the rights of all individuals and communities, regardless of their religion or faith. It also highlights the need for greater understanding and tolerance between different communities, and for the authorities to take steps to prevent communal tensions and violence.
In conclusion, the Madras High Court’s decision to reject the Tamil Nadu government’s appeal against the lighting of a holy ‘deep’ near a dargah is a significant development in the case. The court’s decision reflects the importance of protecting the rights of all individuals and communities, and it highlights the need for greater understanding and tolerance between different communities. The decision is also a blow to the state government, which had been opposing the move to allow the devotees to light the ‘deep’ near the dargah.
The case is a reminder of the ongoing tensions and conflicts between different religious communities in India, and it highlights the need for the authorities to take steps to prevent communal tensions and violence. The court’s decision is a significant step in the right direction, and it reflects the importance of protecting the rights of all individuals and communities.
About the Author
