Complaint filed against Ranveer for mimicking Kantara scene, calling Goddess ‘female ghost’
The world of cinema has always been a sensitive topic, with many films and actors walking a thin line between entertainment and offending certain groups of people. Recently, a police complaint was filed against actor Ranveer Singh in Bengaluru for allegedly hurting religious sentiments by mimicking a scene from Rishab Shetty’s ‘Kantara: Chapter 1’. The complaint, filed by Bengaluru-based advocate Prashanth, claims that Ranveer hurt the sentiments of “millions of Hindus, particularly the Tulu-speaking community of Karnataka” by calling Goddess Chamundi Daiva a ‘female ghost’.
The scene in question from ‘Kantara: Chapter 1’ is a pivotal moment in the film, where the goddess is revered and worshiped by the characters. However, Ranveer’s mimicry of the scene, where he allegedly referred to the goddess as a ‘female ghost’, has been deemed offensive and disrespectful by many. The complainant, Prashanth, has stated that Ranveer’s actions were a deliberate attempt to hurt the religious sentiments of the Hindu community, and particularly the Tulu-speaking people of Karnataka.
The Tulu-speaking community is a significant population in Karnataka, and their culture and traditions are deeply rooted in the state’s history. The goddess Chamundi Daiva is an important deity in the Tulu culture, and any disrespect or mockery of the goddess is taken very seriously. By calling the goddess a ‘female ghost’, Ranveer has allegedly shown a lack of understanding and respect for the cultural and religious significance of the deity.
The complaint filed against Ranveer has sparked a heated debate on social media, with many people weighing in on the issue. Some have come to the defense of the actor, stating that he was simply trying to entertain and did not mean to offend anyone. However, others have expressed outrage and disappointment at Ranveer’s alleged disrespect towards the Hindu community and the Tulu culture.
The issue of hurting religious sentiments is a sensitive one, and it is not the first time that an actor or a film has been accused of offending a particular community. In recent years, there have been several instances of films and actors being criticized for their portrayal of certain communities or deities. The question of what constitutes “hurt sentiments” is a complex one, and it is often subjective and open to interpretation.
However, in this case, the complainant, Prashanth, has stated that Ranveer’s actions were a clear attempt to mock and disrespect the Hindu community and the Tulu culture. The complaint has been filed under Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code, which deals with deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs.
As the complaint against Ranveer makes its way through the legal system, it will be interesting to see how the issue plays out. The actor has not yet commented on the complaint, and it is unclear whether he will apologize or defend his actions. One thing is certain, however – the issue of hurting religious sentiments is a serious one, and it is essential that actors and filmmakers are mindful of the impact of their words and actions on different communities.
In conclusion, the complaint filed against Ranveer Singh for mimicking a scene from ‘Kantara: Chapter 1’ and calling Goddess Chamundi Daiva a ‘female ghost’ is a serious issue that highlights the importance of respecting religious sentiments and cultural traditions. As the debate continues, it is essential to consider the impact of our words and actions on different communities and to be mindful of the cultural and religious significance of certain deities and traditions.
About the Author
