SFIO to charge Vivo in fund diversion case this month: Report
The Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) is set to file its chargesheet against Chinese smartphone maker Vivo this month in an alleged fund diversion case, according to a report by Moneycontrol, citing government sources. This development comes after the SFIO launched a probe into Chinese smartphone makers, including Vivo, following a report by the Registrar of Companies (RoC) alleging fund diversion of around ₹6,000 crore.
The probe, which was initiated last year, has been widening its scope to involve other Chinese smartphone makers, including Oppo and Xiaomi. The investigation is looking into allegations of financial irregularities, including fund diversion, by these companies. The SFIO, which is a specialized agency under the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, is responsible for investigating serious financial frauds and irregularities.
The Registrar of Companies (RoC) report had alleged that Vivo had diverted around ₹6,000 crore to its parent company and other affiliated entities, raising suspicions of money laundering and financial irregularities. The report had also highlighted other irregularities, including non-compliance with Indian laws and regulations.
The SFIO probe is also examining the financial transactions and dealings of Vivo and other Chinese smartphone makers with their parent companies and affiliated entities. The investigation is looking into whether these companies have complied with Indian laws and regulations, including those related to foreign exchange and tax payments.
The development is significant, given the large presence of Chinese smartphone makers in the Indian market. Vivo, Oppo, and Xiaomi are among the top smartphone brands in India, with a significant market share. The probe and potential chargesheet against Vivo could have implications for the company’s operations in India and its relations with the government.
The Indian government has been cracking down on Chinese companies operating in the country, citing concerns over national security and financial irregularities. The government has already banned several Chinese apps, including TikTok and WeChat, citing national security concerns. The probe into Chinese smartphone makers is part of a wider effort by the government to scrutinize the activities of Chinese companies in India.
The SFIO chargesheet against Vivo is expected to be filed this month, according to the Moneycontrol report. The chargesheet will likely detail the allegations of fund diversion and other financial irregularities against Vivo. The company is expected to respond to the chargesheet and defend itself against the allegations.
The case has significant implications for the Indian smartphone market, which is dominated by Chinese companies. The probe and potential chargesheet against Vivo could lead to increased scrutiny of other Chinese smartphone makers operating in India. It could also lead to a re-evaluation of the government’s policies towards Chinese companies operating in the country.
In recent years, the Indian government has been promoting the “Make in India” initiative, which aims to encourage domestic manufacturing and reduce dependence on imports. The government has also been promoting the use of Indian-made smartphones and other electronic devices. The probe into Chinese smartphone makers could be seen as part of this effort to promote domestic manufacturing and reduce dependence on Chinese companies.
The development is also significant, given the large investments made by Chinese companies in India. Chinese companies, including Vivo, Oppo, and Xiaomi, have invested heavily in India, setting up manufacturing facilities and creating jobs. The probe and potential chargesheet against Vivo could lead to a re-evaluation of these investments and the role of Chinese companies in the Indian economy.
In conclusion, the SFIO’s decision to charge Vivo in an alleged fund diversion case is a significant development, with implications for the Indian smartphone market and the government’s policies towards Chinese companies operating in the country. The case highlights the need for greater scrutiny of financial transactions and dealings by Chinese companies operating in India. As the investigation continues, it will be important to monitor the developments and their impact on the Indian smartphone market and the economy as a whole.
About the Author
