Meesho faces investor protest over anchor allotment to SBI Funds
The Indian e-commerce industry has been abuzz with the upcoming initial public offering (IPO) of Meesho, a social commerce platform that has gained significant traction in recent years. However, the company’s anchor book has faced a setback after a significant allocation to SBI Funds Management, prompting other large funds to exit in protest. According to reports, several prominent investors, including Capital Group, Aberdeen Group, ICICI Prudential Asset Management, and Nippon India Life Asset Management, have withdrawn their investments from Meesho’s anchor book.
The anchor book is a critical component of an IPO, as it provides a platform for institutional investors to invest in the company before the public offering. The anchor investors are typically allocated a significant portion of the IPO, and their participation is seen as a vote of confidence in the company’s prospects. However, in Meesho’s case, the allocation to SBI Funds Management has raised eyebrows among other investors.
The reason behind the protest is reportedly the significant allocation to SBI Funds Management, which has been perceived as unfair by other investors. The allocation is believed to be substantial, with some reports suggesting that SBI Funds Management may have received as much as 20-25% of the anchor book. This has led to concerns among other investors that the allocation process may not have been transparent or fair.
Despite the withdrawal of several prominent investors, Meesho’s IPO lineup still includes several global investors, such as GIC and BlackRock. These investors have reportedly committed to invest in the company, and their participation is expected to provide a significant boost to the IPO. However, the exit of other large funds has raised concerns about the overall demand for the IPO and the company’s ability to raise the desired amount of capital.
The incident highlights the challenges faced by companies in managing their investor relationships, particularly during the IPO process. The allocation of shares to anchor investors is a critical aspect of the IPO, and companies must ensure that the process is fair and transparent to avoid any controversy. In Meesho’s case, the allocation to SBI Funds Management has raised questions about the company’s investor allocation strategy and its ability to manage the expectations of its investors.
The controversy surrounding Meesho’s anchor book allocation is also a reminder of the importance of maintaining a robust and transparent investor allocation process. Companies must ensure that their allocation process is fair, transparent, and based on clear criteria to avoid any disputes or controversies. This is particularly important in the context of an IPO, where the allocation of shares to anchor investors can have a significant impact on the overall success of the offering.
In conclusion, Meesho’s anchor book allocation controversy has raised important questions about the company’s investor allocation strategy and its ability to manage the expectations of its investors. While the company’s IPO lineup still includes several prominent global investors, the exit of other large funds has raised concerns about the overall demand for the IPO and the company’s ability to raise the desired amount of capital. As the company moves forward with its IPO plans, it will be important to address these concerns and ensure that the allocation process is fair, transparent, and based on clear criteria.
The incident also highlights the importance of maintaining a robust and transparent investor allocation process, particularly in the context of an IPO. Companies must ensure that their allocation process is fair, transparent, and based on clear criteria to avoid any disputes or controversies. This is critical to maintaining the trust and confidence of investors, which is essential for the success of any IPO.
The Meesho IPO controversy is a reminder that the Indian e-commerce industry is highly competitive, and companies must be prepared to navigate complex investor relationships and allocation processes to succeed. As the industry continues to evolve, it will be important for companies to prioritize transparency, fairness, and clarity in their investor allocation processes to maintain the trust and confidence of their investors.
About the Author
