Twinkle Khanna takes dig at Zomato CEO Deepinder Goyal’s gravity ageing theory
The concept of ageing has been a topic of discussion for centuries, with various theories attempting to explain the underlying causes of this natural process. Recently, Zomato CEO Deepinder Goyal sparked a debate with his claim that gravity is the primary reason behind ageing. However, not everyone is convinced by his theory, and renowned author Twinkle Khanna has been quick to respond with a witty and well-reasoned rebuttal.
Goyal’s theory, which has been doing the rounds on social media, suggests that gravity is the culprit behind our bodies’ deterioration over time. According to him, the constant pull of gravity on our bodies leads to the breakdown of our cells, resulting in the visible signs of ageing. While this idea may seem intriguing at first, Twinkle Khanna has pointed out the flaws in Goyal’s reasoning.
In a recent post, Twinkle Khanna expressed her initial temptation to take Goyal’s theory seriously, given his credentials as a successful entrepreneur. However, upon closer examination, she found the idea to be lacking in scientific merit. “If gravity were the kryptonite stopping us from turning into Superman, we might consider astronauts like Sunita Williams, who returned to Earth after spending nine months floating in microgravity,” Twinkle wrote. “She returned, not with a cape and superhuman strength, but with weaker bones, muscles, and heart,” she added.
Twinkle’s argument is rooted in the fact that astronauts, who spend extended periods in space, experience a range of physical changes due to the microgravity environment. While they may not be subjected to the same level of gravitational pull as people on Earth, they still undergo significant physical changes, including muscle and bone loss. This, Twinkle argues, contradicts Goyal’s theory that gravity is the primary cause of ageing.
Moreover, Twinkle also pointed out that the human body is capable of adapting to a range of environments, including those with varying levels of gravity. For instance, people living in high-altitude regions, where the gravitational pull is slightly weaker, do not exhibit any significant differences in their ageing process compared to those living at sea level. This, she suggests, further undermines Goyal’s theory.
The debate surrounding Goyal’s theory has sparked a wider discussion about the nature of ageing and the factors that contribute to it. While gravity may play a role in certain physical processes, such as the formation of wrinkles and age-related diseases like osteoporosis, it is unlikely to be the sole cause of ageing. Other factors, including genetics, lifestyle, and environmental influences, are likely to play a much more significant role in determining our overall health and wellbeing as we age.
In conclusion, Twinkle Khanna’s response to Deepinder Goyal’s theory serves as a reminder of the importance of critically evaluating ideas, even those presented by prominent figures. While Goyal’s theory may have sparked an interesting debate, it is essential to approach such claims with a healthy dose of skepticism and to consider the scientific evidence before accepting or rejecting them.
As we continue to explore the complexities of ageing and the factors that influence it, it is crucial to rely on empirical evidence and scientific research rather than speculative theories. By doing so, we can work towards a deeper understanding of this natural process and develop effective strategies for promoting healthy ageing and wellbeing.
It will be interesting to see how this debate unfolds, with more experts and thought leaders weighing in on the topic. For now, Twinkle Khanna’s response serves as a timely reminder of the importance of critical thinking and the need to approach claims with a nuanced and evidence-based perspective.
About the Author
