Narayana Murthy justifies 70 hour work week again, cites China’s 9-9-6 practice
In a recent interview, Infosys Founder Narayana Murthy sparked a heated debate by justifying his call for a 70-hour work week. Murthy, who is known for his demanding work ethic, cited China’s infamous 9-9-6 practice as a benchmark for his argument. For those who may not be familiar, the 9-9-6 practice refers to a work culture where employees are expected to work from 9 am to 9 pm, six days a week. This translates to a staggering 72 hours of work per week.
Murthy’s comments have raised eyebrows, particularly given that China’s Supreme Court declared the 9-9-6 practice illegal in 2021. The practice, which is also known as the “996” culture, has been widely criticized for its exploitative nature and the negative impact it has on employees’ physical and mental health. Despite this, Murthy seems to believe that this kind of work ethic is necessary for success, at least in the tech industry.
During the interview, Murthy reiterated his stance on work-life balance, saying that people should first “get a life and then worry about work-life balance.” This statement has been met with skepticism by many, who argue that a healthy work-life balance is essential for productivity, job satisfaction, and overall well-being. By prioritizing work over personal life, employees may be more likely to experience burnout, stress, and decreased motivation.
The 9-9-6 practice has been a topic of debate in China for several years, with many employees speaking out against the culture of overwork. The practice is common in the tech industry, where employees are often expected to work long hours to meet demanding deadlines and keep up with the fast-paced nature of the industry. However, the practice has been linked to a range of negative consequences, including increased stress, decreased productivity, and a higher risk of burnout.
It’s worth noting that China’s Supreme Court ruling against the 9-9-6 practice was a significant milestone in the country’s efforts to protect workers’ rights. The ruling stated that employers cannot force employees to work excessive hours without their consent, and that employees have the right to refuse overtime work. This ruling has been seen as a major victory for workers’ rights in China, and has sparked a wider conversation about the need for better work-life balance in the country.
In contrast, Murthy’s comments seem to be out of touch with the growing recognition of the importance of work-life balance. Many companies, including those in the tech industry, are now prioritizing employee well-being and offering flexible work arrangements to support work-life balance. This shift towards a more balanced approach to work is driven by the recognition that happy, healthy employees are more productive, creative, and committed to their work.
Murthy’s justification of the 70-hour work week also raises questions about the kind of work culture that Infosys and other companies are promoting. While Murthy may believe that a 70-hour work week is necessary for success, it’s worth considering the potential consequences of such a demanding work ethic. By prioritizing work over personal life, companies may be creating a culture of burnout, where employees are exhausted, demotivated, and more likely to leave the company.
In conclusion, Narayana Murthy’s comments on the 70-hour work week and his citation of China’s 9-9-6 practice have sparked a heated debate about the nature of work and the importance of work-life balance. While Murthy may believe that a demanding work ethic is necessary for success, it’s worth considering the potential consequences of such an approach. By prioritizing employee well-being and offering flexible work arrangements, companies can create a more balanced and sustainable approach to work, one that supports the health, happiness, and productivity of their employees.
About the Author
