
Pant’s LSG Coach Says His Famous Gabba Knock Was on Flat Track
Rishabh Pant’s incredible century at the Gabba in 2021 will be etched in the memories of cricket fans for a long time. The Indian wicket-keeper batter’s unbeaten 89 off 132 balls helped India chase down a daunting target of 328 and win the series 2-1 against Australia. However, Pant’s head coach at the Lucknow Super Giants (LSG), Justin Langer, has thrown some cold water on the legendary knock by saying that the wicket was flat during that match.
In an interview, Langer said, “I don’t rate his Gabba knock as one of the greatest, but it was an amazing and incredible knock.” When asked to elaborate, he stated, “It was on a flat track, and he played really well on that wicket. He’s a fantastic player, and he’s got a lot of talent.”
Langer’s comments have sparked a debate among cricket fans and experts, with some questioning whether the wicket was indeed as flat as he claimed. The Gabba pitch was known for being a challenging one, with bounce and spin, which made it difficult for batsmen to score freely. However, Langer’s experience as a coach and former player gives his opinion significant weight.
It’s not the first time that a coach or expert has downplayed a legendary performance. In cricket, there’s often a fine line between genius and luck, and Langer’s comments highlight the importance of context in evaluating a player’s performance.
Pant’s Gabba knock was remarkable not only for its sheer brilliance but also for the context in which it was played. India was facing a daunting target, and Pant’s innings turned the game on its head. His partnership with Washington Sundar, who scored 22 off 20 balls, was instrumental in India’s victory.
Langer’s comments also highlight the importance of a good pitch in cricket. A good pitch can make a batsman look like a genius, while a bad one can expose even the best players. In the case of Pant’s Gabba knock, Langer’s claim that the wicket was flat suggests that Pant’s skills were more important than the pitch in determining the outcome of the game.
However, some experts have questioned Langer’s claim, pointing out that the pitch was not as flat as he suggested. Former Australian fast bowler, Mitchell Johnson, who was part of the Australian team during the series, said, “I don’t think it was a flat track at all. It was a good wicket, but it had some pace and bounce, and it was challenging for the batsmen.”
Johnson’s comments highlight the importance of perspective in evaluating a pitch. As a bowler, he would have been keenly aware of the conditions and would have had a different perspective on the wicket than a batsman like Pant.
In conclusion, Langer’s comments have sparked a debate among cricket fans and experts, with some questioning whether the Gabba wicket was indeed as flat as he claimed. While Pant’s Gabba knock was an incredible one, Langer’s comments highlight the importance of context in evaluating a player’s performance. As a coach, Langer knows that a good pitch can make a batsman look like a genius, and his comments suggest that Pant’s skills were more important than the pitch in determining the outcome of the game.