Arrest 4-5 ministers & govt is gone: Owaisi on PM-CM removal Bills
All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) chief Asaduddin Owaisi has stirred a controversy by stating that the proposed Constitution (130th) Amendment Bill, which provides for the removal of Prime Minister, Chief Ministers, and ministers arrested for at least 30 days, is a recipe for chaos. According to Owaisi, if the proposed bill is passed, all that is required to bring down the government is to arrest four to five ministers.
Owaisi’s statement came during a discussion on the proposed bill, which aims to provide a mechanism for the removal of Prime Minister, Chief Ministers, and ministers who have been arrested for at least 30 days. The bill is currently being examined by a Parliamentary Committee.
The AIMIM chief was critical of the proposed bill, saying that it gives too much power to the President to remove the Prime Minister. “This proposed bill is saying that the President can remove the Prime Minister. What is this?” he asked.
Owaisi’s statement has sparked a heated debate, with many arguing that the bill is necessary to address the issue of corruption and misgovernance in the country. Others have criticized the bill, saying that it is a threat to the democratic system and could lead to an abuse of power.
The proposed bill has been introduced by the government in an effort to address the issue of corruption and misgovernance in the country. The bill provides for the removal of Prime Minister, Chief Ministers, and ministers who have been arrested for at least 30 days. The bill also provides for the appointment of an interim Prime Minister or Chief Minister in the event of the removal of the incumbent.
However, Owaisi and other opposition leaders have criticized the bill, saying that it is a threat to the democratic system and could lead to an abuse of power. They argue that the bill gives too much power to the President and could lead to the removal of elected leaders without due process.
The proposed bill has also raised concerns about the potential for abuse of power. Many have argued that the bill could be used to remove political opponents or to settle personal scores. Others have criticized the bill, saying that it is a threat to the institutions of democracy and could lead to a breakdown in the system.
In response to the criticism, the government has defended the proposed bill, saying that it is necessary to address the issue of corruption and misgovernance in the country. The government has also argued that the bill provides for due process and ensures that the removal of Prime Minister, Chief Ministers, and ministers is done in a fair and transparent manner.
The proposed bill is currently being examined by a Parliamentary Committee, which is considering the recommendations of various stakeholders. The committee is expected to submit its report soon, which will guide the government’s decision on the proposed bill.
In conclusion, the proposed Constitution (130th) Amendment Bill has sparked a heated debate, with many arguing that it is necessary to address the issue of corruption and misgovernance in the country. Others have criticized the bill, saying that it is a threat to the democratic system and could lead to an abuse of power. The bill is currently being examined by a Parliamentary Committee, which is expected to submit its report soon.
