
Title: My Bail Application was Pending for 2 Yrs Thanks to Ex-SC Justice Aftab Alam: Amit Shah
As Home Minister of India, Amit Shah is no stranger to controversy and criticism. However, in a recent statement, he made a shocking revelation that has left many in the country stunned. Shah revealed that his bail application in the Sohrabuddin encounter case lasted for a whopping two years, thanks to the persistence of former Supreme Court Justice Aftab Alam.
The statement was made in a public event, where Shah claimed that his bail application was pending for an unprecedented two years, a record that has never been broken in India’s history. “In India’s history, no one’s bail application has lasted for two years…At the most, [it] lasts for 11 days,” he said.
Shah’s revelation has sparked widespread curiosity, with many wondering what could have led to such an extraordinary delay. The Sohrabuddin encounter case, which dates back to 2005, was a highly publicized and controversial incident in which a gangster named Sohrabuddin Sheikh was killed in a fake encounter by Gujarat police.
Shah’s connection to the case lies in his alleged involvement as the then Home Minister of Gujarat. He was accused of being directly involved in the planning and execution of the encounter, which led to a lengthy investigation and numerous court hearings.
However, Shah has consistently denied any wrongdoing and has maintained that he was merely carrying out his duties as a public servant. Despite this, the case dragged on for years, with Shah’s bail application being repeatedly rejected by the courts.
It is this rejected bail application that Shah attributes to the persistence of former Supreme Court Justice Aftab Alam. According to Shah, Alam’s refusal to grant bail was the primary reason for the delay, which ultimately lasted for two years.
Shah’s statement has sparked a heated debate in the country, with many questioning the motivations behind Alam’s decision. Some have accused Shah of trying to deflect attention from his alleged involvement in the case, while others have praised his courage in speaking out about the ordeal.
Regardless of one’s opinion on the matter, Shah’s revelation has shed new light on the complex and often contentious world of Indian justice. The fact that a bail application can last for two years is a stark reminder of the complexities and challenges that judges face in making decisions.
Moreover, Shah’s statement has raised questions about the role of the judiciary in ensuring justice and fairness. While judges are meant to be impartial and independent, their decisions can have far-reaching consequences that can affect the lives of ordinary citizens.
Shah’s case is a stark reminder of the need for greater transparency and accountability in the justice system. As Home Minister, Shah has a unique insight into the workings of the system, and his revelation has sparked a much-needed conversation about the need for reform.
In conclusion, Shah’s statement about his bail application being pending for two years has sparked a heated debate in the country. While opinions may vary on the matter, it is clear that the case highlights the complexities and challenges that judges face in making decisions. As the country moves forward, it is essential that we prioritize transparency and accountability in the justice system, to ensure that justice is served and that the rights of citizens are protected.
News Source:
https://x.com/ANI/status/1959844375724232945