Title: Akshay, Arshad Get Notice for Allegedly Mocking Legal System in ‘Jolly LLB 3’
The debate surrounding the portrayal of legal professionals in films has been a longstanding one. With the release of the upcoming film ‘Jolly LLB 3’, starring Akshay Kumar and Arshad Warsi, the issue has once again taken center stage. A Pune court has issued a notice to the two actors, accusing them of allegedly mocking the legal system in the film.
The notice was issued by lawyer Wajid Khan, who has filed a petition claiming that the film portrays the legal profession in a derogatory manner and insults the judiciary. According to Khan, the film depicts judges as incompetent and corrupt, which is detrimental to the reputation of the legal system as a whole.
One of the specific scenes that Khan has objected to is a scene where judges are referred to as “mamu”, which is a colloquial term used to address an uncle. Khan claims that this is an insult to the judiciary and demeans the authority of judges.
The notice has been issued under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which deals with the power of the court to punish for contempt. Khan has requested the court to take cognizance of the alleged contempt and take appropriate action against Akshay Kumar, Arshad Warsi, and the film’s producer, Fox Star Studios.
The controversy surrounding the film’s depiction of the legal system is not new. Earlier this year, the film’s trailer sparked a debate on social media, with many lawyers and legal professionals expressing their discontent with the film’s portrayal of the judiciary.
In response to the notice, Akshay Kumar’s spokesperson stated that the film was meant to be a satirical take on the legal system and did not intend to mock or insult the judiciary. The spokesperson also claimed that the film was meant to highlight the issues faced by the legal system and the need for reforms.
Arshad Warsi’s spokesperson also released a statement, saying that the film was meant to be a light-hearted take on the legal system and did not intend to offend anyone. The spokesperson also claimed that the film was meant to promote the legal profession and the importance of justice.
The controversy surrounding ‘Jolly LLB 3’ is a reminder of the importance of responsible representation of the legal system in films. While satire and comedy can be effective ways to critique the legal system, it is also important to ensure that the portrayal does not perpetuate harmful stereotypes or insults the judiciary.
In recent years, there have been several instances of films and TV shows being criticized for their portrayal of the legal system. From the depiction of lawyers as corrupt and greedy in films like ‘Judwaa 2’ to the portrayal of judges as incompetent and corrupt in TV shows like ‘Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah’, the representation of the legal system on screen has been a topic of concern for many legal professionals.
The controversy surrounding ‘Jolly LLB 3’ is also a reminder of the importance of self-regulation in the film industry. While the industry has a code of conduct that is meant to ensure responsible representation of professions and institutions, it is often disregarded in the pursuit of entertainment.
In conclusion, the notice issued to Akshay Kumar and Arshad Warsi for allegedly mocking the legal system in ‘Jolly LLB 3’ is a timely reminder of the importance of responsible representation of the legal system in films. While satire and comedy can be effective ways to critique the legal system, it is also important to ensure that the portrayal does not perpetuate harmful stereotypes or insults the judiciary.
As the film industry continues to navigate the complex issue of representation, it is essential to promote responsible and respectful portrayal of professions and institutions. By doing so, we can ensure that the legal system is represented in a positive and accurate manner, and that the public’s perception of the judiciary is not tarnished by harmful stereotypes.
