Coolie Echoes ‘Vikram’, Rajinikanth Becomes Saving Grace
Rajinikanth’s latest film, Coolie, has received mixed reviews from critics, with some praising the actor’s performance while others have criticized the film’s storyline and direction. In his review for Hindustan Times, Abhimanyu Mathur gave the film 2.5 stars, comparing it unfavorably to director Lokesh Kanagaraj’s 2022 hit, Vikram.
Mathur’s review begins by stating that Coolie “meanders in all directions, ending up as a diluted version of his 2022 hit.” He notes that the film lacks the cohesion and focus that made Vikram enjoyable, and that the storyline is overly convoluted and confusing.
However, Mathur does acknowledge that Rajinikanth’s presence and persona are among the saving graces of the film. He praises the actor’s ability to pack a punch, even in a lackluster script, and notes that his character’s determination and conviction are admirable.
So, what does this say about the film? Is it a worthy successor to Vikram, or is it a disappointing follow-up? Let’s take a closer look at the review and what it means for fans of the actor and the film.
A Lackluster Script
One of the biggest criticisms of Coolie is its script, which Mathur describes as “diluted” and “confusing.” He notes that the film’s storyline is overly complicated, with too many characters and plot twists that fail to engage the audience. This is in stark contrast to Vikram, which had a more streamlined and focused narrative that kept viewers on the edge of their seats.
It’s clear that the script is a major problem for Coolie, and that the film’s inability to tell a compelling story is holding it back. This is a shame, as Rajinikanth is an actor known for his ability to elevate even the most mediocre scripts with his presence and charisma.
Rajinikanth’s Performance
However, Mathur does praise Rajinikanth’s performance in the film, noting that his presence and persona are among the saving graces of the movie. He praises the actor’s ability to pack a punch, even in a lackluster script, and notes that his character’s determination and conviction are admirable.
This is no surprise, as Rajinikanth is an actor known for his incredible range and charisma. He has a way of bringing characters to life, even in films that are flawed or lackluster. His presence is always a welcome addition to any film, and it’s clear that he is the highlight of Coolie.
A Disappointing Follow-Up
Unfortunately, Coolie’s script and storyline are not enough to redeem the film from its overall disappointment. Mathur’s comparison to Vikram is telling, as it highlights the film’s failure to live up to the standards set by that film.
It’s clear that director Lokesh Kanagaraj’s attempt to replicate the success of Vikram has fallen flat, and that Coolie is a disappointing follow-up to that film. While Rajinikanth’s performance is certainly enjoyable, it’s not enough to save the film from its overall lack of cohesion and focus.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Coolie’s review by Abhimanyu Mathur for Hindustan Times highlights the film’s disappointing script and storyline, but also praises Rajinikanth’s performance. While the film may have some redeeming qualities, it’s clear that it falls short of the standards set by Vikram.
For fans of Rajinikanth and the film, this review is a mixed bag. While it’s clear that the actor’s presence is a highlight of the film, the script and storyline are major letdowns. It’s a shame, as Coolie had the potential to be a great film, but ultimately falls short.
Source:
