
Give Proof, Don’t Use Dirty Phrases Like ‘Vote Chori’: EC to Rahul
In a recent development, the Election Commission of India (EC) has taken a strong stance against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s allegations of “vote theft” in the upcoming Lok Sabha elections. The poll body has asked Gandhi to provide concrete evidence of any person voting twice in any election, and has also cautioned him against using derogatory language that undermines the integrity of the electoral process.
Gandhi had earlier made a scathing attack on the EC, accusing it of allowing “vote theft” in the elections. However, the EC has responded by saying that such allegations are baseless and lack concrete evidence. The commission has asked Gandhi to provide specific instances of vote theft, and has warned him against using language that is inflammatory and divisive.
The EC has also taken umbrage with Gandhi’s use of the phrase “vote chori”, which translates to “vote theft” in English. The commission has said that this phrase is a direct attack on Indian electors and on the integrity of lakhs of election staff who work tirelessly to ensure that the electoral process is fair and transparent.
The EC has also reminded Gandhi that the electoral process is a sacred institution that requires respect and dignity. The commission has said that allegations of vote theft or any other form of electoral malpractice can be made, but they must be backed by concrete evidence and not made in a manner that is inflammatory or divisive.
Gandhi’s allegations of vote theft have been met with skepticism by many, including political analysts and election experts. They point out that the EC has put in place a robust electoral process that is designed to prevent fraud and ensure that every vote counts. The commission has also taken numerous steps to ensure the integrity of the electoral process, including the use of technology to track voters and prevent duplicate voting.
The EC has also reminded Gandhi that the electoral process is a sacred institution that requires respect and dignity. The commission has said that allegations of vote theft or any other form of electoral malpractice can be made, but they must be backed by concrete evidence and not made in a manner that is inflammatory or divisive.
Gandhi’s allegations have also been criticized by other political parties, which have accused him of trying to discredit the EC and undermine the electoral process. The EC has also been accused of being biased in favor of the ruling party, and of allowing the party to use its resources to influence the outcome of the elections.
However, the EC has denied these allegations, saying that it is committed to ensuring that the electoral process is fair and transparent. The commission has also said that it will take all necessary steps to ensure that the elections are conducted in a free and fair manner, and that every vote counts.
In conclusion, the EC’s response to Gandhi’s allegations of vote theft is a clear indication that the commission is committed to ensuring the integrity of the electoral process. The commission has asked Gandhi to provide concrete evidence of any person voting twice in any election, and has also cautioned him against using derogatory language that undermines the integrity of the electoral process.
The EC has also reminded Gandhi that the electoral process is a sacred institution that requires respect and dignity. The commission has said that allegations of vote theft or any other form of electoral malpractice can be made, but they must be backed by concrete evidence and not made in a manner that is inflammatory or divisive.
In the end, it is up to Gandhi to provide concrete evidence of any person voting twice in any election. Until then, the EC’s caution against using derogatory language is a timely reminder that the electoral process is a sacred institution that requires respect and dignity.
Source:
https://www.ptinews.com/story/national/Give-proof–don-t-use-dirty-phrases-like–vote-chori—EC/2820793