Appalled by filth & chaos: Hansal on Mumbai’s infrastructure
Mumbai, the city of dreams, often finds itself at the receiving end of criticism for its poor infrastructure, chaotic traffic, and unhygienic conditions. Recently, filmmaker Hansal Mehta joined the chorus of voices lamenting the city’s plight, calling out the residents’ collective indifference towards the issue and questioning the authorities’ inaction. In a scathing critique, Mehta expressed his frustration and disappointment at the state of affairs in the city, urging both the authorities and the citizens to take collective responsibility for improving the situation.
Mehta’s outburst came in response to a series of issues plaguing the city, including the recent flooding in several areas, the ongoing water crisis, and the perpetual traffic jams. In an open letter addressed to the authorities and the residents of Mumbai, Mehta wrote, “How long will we continue to live like this?…I still believe I love this city…But it’s strangled by those in power…They profit from its decay and dress it up as resilience.”
Mehta’s comments are not without merit. Mumbai’s infrastructure has long been a topic of concern, with the city struggling to cope with its rapid growth and the resulting strain on its resources. The city’s roads are often congested, its public transport system is overburdened, and its water supply is woefully inadequate. The situation is further exacerbated by the apathy of the residents, who seem to have become accustomed to the chaos and the filth that surrounds them.
But Mehta’s criticism is not limited to the authorities alone. He also takes the residents of Mumbai to task for their collective indifference towards the issue. He argues that the residents’ attitude towards the city’s problems is a major contributor to the city’s decline, and that it is only by acknowledging the problem and taking collective responsibility for solving it that the city can begin to change for the better.
Mehta’s comments have sparked a heated debate on social media, with many people agreeing with his assessment of the situation and calling for urgent action to address the city’s problems. Others, however, have criticized Mehta for being too harsh on the city and its residents, arguing that he is not giving due credit to the many organizations and individuals working to improve the city’s infrastructure and living conditions.
Despite the controversy, Mehta’s comments serve as a stark reminder of the need for change in Mumbai. The city’s poor infrastructure and chaotic conditions are not only a source of frustration for its residents, but also a major obstacle to its growth and development. By acknowledging the problem and taking collective responsibility for solving it, the residents of Mumbai can work together to create a better future for themselves and for future generations.
In conclusion, Mehta’s comments are a wake-up call for both the authorities and the residents of Mumbai. The city’s poor infrastructure and chaotic conditions are not acceptable, and it is only by working together that the city can begin to change for the better. Mehta’s words serve as a reminder of the importance of taking collective responsibility for the city’s problems and working towards a better future.
