
Why Assume Pak Terrorists Attacked Pahalgam: Chidambaram Ahead of Op Sindoor Debate, Slammed
The debate surrounding Operation Sindoor, a counter-terrorism operation launched by the Indian Army in Jammu and Kashmir, is heating up in the Parliament. Amidst the heated discussions, Congress leader P Chidambaram made a statement that has sparked controversy. Chidambaram questioned the assumption that the recent attack on Pahalgam was carried out by Pakistan-based terrorists. He suggested that the attackers could have been homegrown as well.
The statement came as a surprise to many, especially considering the prevailing narrative that Pakistan-based terrorist organizations are responsible for most of the attacks in Jammu and Kashmir. Chidambaram’s comments have been criticized by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and other opposition parties, who see it as a attempt to downplay the role of Pakistan in fomenting terrorism in the region.
Chidambaram’s statement was made during a discussion on the Operation Sindoor in the Parliament. The operation was launched in response to a series of attacks on Indian security forces in Jammu and Kashmir. The Congress leader’s comments were seen as an attempt to dilute the focus on Pakistan’s role in terrorism and instead emphasize the need to address the internal security challenges in the region.
However, the BJP and other opposition parties were quick to slam Chidambaram’s statement. Amit Malviya, the BJP’s IT cell head, took to Twitter to criticize Chidambaram. “Once again, Congress rushes to give a clean chit to Pakistan…Why do Congress leaders sound more like Islamabad’s defence lawyers than India’s opposition?” Malviya tweeted.
Chidambaram’s statement has also been criticized by other opposition parties, who see it as a attempt to sympathize with terrorist organizations. The ruling BJP party has been quick to capitalize on the controversy, with many of its leaders attacking Chidambaram and the Congress party for their stance.
The controversy surrounding Chidambaram’s statement has also sparked a debate on the role of Pakistan in terrorism. Many experts and leaders have argued that Pakistan-based terrorist organizations, such as Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, have been responsible for most of the attacks in Jammu and Kashmir. The Pakistan government has been accused of providing support and shelter to these organizations, which has allowed them to operate with impunity.
However, Chidambaram’s statement has also raised questions about the need to address the internal security challenges in Jammu and Kashmir. Many experts have argued that the region’s complex political and social dynamics, including the ongoing political unrest and the presence of militant groups, make it vulnerable to internal security threats.
The controversy surrounding Chidambaram’s statement is just the latest example of the intense political debate surrounding Operation Sindoor. The operation has been criticized by many opposition parties, who see it as an attempt by the government to impose its will on the people of Jammu and Kashmir. The government has defended the operation, saying that it is necessary to counter the growing threat of terrorism in the region.
In conclusion, the debate surrounding Operation Sindoor and Chidambaram’s statement highlights the complex and contentious nature of the issue. While Chidambaram’s statement has been criticized for downplaying the role of Pakistan in terrorism, it has also raised questions about the need to address the internal security challenges in Jammu and Kashmir. The controversy is likely to continue, with both sides dug in and refusing to back down.