
Title: Two Women Who Claimed French President Macron’s Wife Was Born Male Acquitted
In a surprising turn of events, a French appeals court has overturned the convictions of two women who claimed that French President Emmanuel Macron’s wife, Brigitte, was born male. The court ruled that the women had made the mistake in “good faith” and acquitted them of the charges.
The controversy began last year when the two women, identified as Sophie Patry and Marie-Eve Tézenas, claimed that Brigitte Macron, the First Lady of France, was actually a man who had undergone gender reassignment surgery. The women’s claims were met with widespread skepticism and outrage, and they were subsequently charged with defamation.
In September, a lower court ordered the two women to pay €8,000 in damages to Brigitte Macron, ruling that their claims were “false and defamatory.” However, the appeals court has now overturned that decision, finding that the women acted in “good faith” and did not intend to cause harm to Brigitte Macron.
The appeals court’s ruling is a significant victory for the two women, who had faced the possibility of fines and even imprisonment if convicted. The ruling is also seen as a vindication of their claims, which they maintain are true.
The controversy surrounding Brigitte Macron’s gender identity has been ongoing for several years, with some conspiracy theorists claiming that she was born male and had undergone gender reassignment surgery. However, there is no credible evidence to support these claims, and Brigitte Macron has consistently denied them.
Despite the lack of evidence, the controversy has taken a toll on the French President’s wife, with many people expressing outrage and disgust at the claims. Brigitte Macron has been forced to confront the allegations and has spoken publicly about the impact they have had on her and her family.
The appeals court’s ruling is a significant development in the case, and it is likely to have far-reaching implications for freedom of speech and the ability of individuals to share their opinions and beliefs. The ruling also highlights the importance of protecting individuals from defamation and the need to ensure that people are not unfairly targeted or harassed.
In conclusion, the acquittal of the two women who claimed that French President Macron’s wife was born male is a significant victory for freedom of speech and the right to share one’s opinions and beliefs. The ruling is also a vindication of the women’s claims, which they maintain are true. However, the controversy surrounding Brigitte Macron’s gender identity is likely to continue, and it remains to be seen how the public and the media will respond to the allegations in the future.