To Each Their Own: Soundarya on ‘Housefull 5’ Backlash
The recent release of ‘Housefull 5’ has been met with controversy, with many criticizing the film for its objectification of women and use of sexist humor. The movie, which stars Akshay Kumar, Kriti Sanon, and others, has been accused of perpetuating harmful stereotypes and making light of serious issues.
One of the characters in the film, played by Soundarya Sharma, has been at the center of the backlash. In an interview, Soundarya defended the film, saying that it was meant to be a lighthearted comedy and that the characters were meant to be a reflection of society.
“The film was made on a lighter note…and all these characters are a reflection of our own society,” Soundarya said. “I want to say it’s your choice to see and focus on that aspect of the film.”
Soundarya’s comments have sparked a heated debate online, with many people praising her for her defense of the film and others criticizing her for seemingly condoning the objectification of women. But what does it mean to “choose” what aspect of the film to focus on? Is it truly a matter of personal preference, or is there a responsibility to consider the impact that a film can have on its audience?
One of the main criticisms of ‘Housefull 5’ is that it perpetuates harmful stereotypes and makes light of serious issues. The film has been accused of using women as mere objects for comedic effect, rather than as fully fleshed-out characters. This is particularly problematic in a society where women are already underrepresented and marginalized.
But Soundarya’s defense of the film suggests that she sees the characters as simply a reflection of society. In other words, the film is simply mirroring the societal norms and values that we see around us. This is a common argument in the context of media and representation, with some people arguing that a film or TV show can simply reflect the reality of the world, rather than trying to change it.
However, this argument is problematic for several reasons. Firstly, it suggests that the societal norms and values that we see around us are inherently good and just. But this is not always the case. In fact, many societal norms and values are rooted in oppression and marginalization.
Secondly, the argument that a film can simply reflect reality without trying to challenge it is a cop-out. Media has the power to shape our perceptions and attitudes, and it is the responsibility of creators to use this power thoughtfully. A film that simply reflects societal norms and values without challenging them is doing a disservice to its audience.
So, what does it mean to “choose” what aspect of the film to focus on? Is it truly a matter of personal preference, or is there a responsibility to consider the impact that a film can have on its audience? Soundarya’s comments suggest that it is a matter of personal preference, and that we should be able to ignore the problematic aspects of the film. But this is not a responsible approach.
As consumers of media, we have a responsibility to think critically about the content we consume. We should be aware of the potential impact that a film can have on us, and we should be willing to challenge and criticize problematic representations. This is particularly important in the context of representation, where the media can have a significant impact on our perceptions and attitudes.
In conclusion, Soundarya’s comments on the backlash against ‘Housefull 5’ highlight the complex and nuanced nature of representation in media. While it is important to consider the potential impact that a film can have on its audience, it is also important to think critically about the representations presented. We should be aware of the potential harm that a film can cause, and we should be willing to challenge and criticize problematic representations.
News Source: https://news.abplive.com/entertainment/soundarya-sharma-defends-housefull-5-sexism-backlash-1779865/amp
