Top Police Officials Made Scapegoat in Bengaluru Tragedy: Guha
The recent stampede incident in Bengaluru has left the city in shock, with at least 11 people losing their lives and many more injured. The incident has sparked a heated debate about the responsibility of the Karnataka government and the police in ensuring public safety. Historian Ramachandra Guha has now weighed in on the matter, criticizing the government for suspending senior IPS officers in the aftermath of the tragedy.
In an interview with a leading news publication, Guha expressed his disappointment and outrage at the decision to suspend the police officials, including the Bengaluru Police Commissioner. “Karnataka’s ruling politicians are jointly responsible for the tragedy. Their greedy lust for reflected glory led to it. To make an outstanding officer a scapegoat is reprehensible,” Guha said.
The historian’s scathing criticism comes in the wake of the Karnataka government’s decision to suspend several top police officials, including the Bengaluru Police Commissioner, in the aftermath of the stampede. The incident occurred on November 24, when a large crowd of people gathered at the Kanteerava Stadium to receive gifts and prizes from the government. The crowd surged forward, leading to a stampede that resulted in the tragic loss of lives.
Guha’s criticism of the government’s decision to suspend the police officials is not without merit. The police were responsible for ensuring public safety and maintaining order at the event, but it was the government’s own policies and decisions that contributed to the tragedy. The government had announced the distribution of gifts and prizes without adequate planning or preparedness, leading to a chaotic situation.
Moreover, the government’s decision to suspend the police officials without conducting a thorough investigation into the incident raises serious questions about the fairness and impartiality of the probe. It is unclear what role the suspended officials played in the incident, and whether they were truly responsible for the tragedy.
In contrast, the government’s own actions and decisions seem to have contributed to the chaos and confusion that led to the stampede. The government had announced the distribution of gifts and prizes without adequate planning or preparedness, leading to a chaotic situation. The police were understaffed and underprepared to handle the situation, and the government failed to provide adequate support or resources to ensure public safety.
Guha’s criticism of the government’s decision to suspend the police officials is not the only criticism of the government’s handling of the situation. Many have questioned the government’s decision to distribute gifts and prizes without adequate planning or preparedness, and its failure to provide adequate support or resources to ensure public safety.
The incident has also highlighted the need for greater accountability and transparency in government decision-making. The government’s decision to suspend the police officials without conducting a thorough investigation into the incident raises serious questions about the fairness and impartiality of the probe.
In conclusion, Guha’s criticism of the government’s decision to suspend the police officials is a timely reminder of the need for greater accountability and transparency in government decision-making. The incident has highlighted the need for greater planning and preparedness in public events, as well as the need for greater support and resources to ensure public safety.
Source:
